“…These two methods may not be comparable due to different types of patients and severity of clinical presentations in these treatments. 8 Visual outcomes after these interventions has been reviewed, yielding 49.3%, 56.6%, 67.2%, and 84.6% improvement in patients following ventriculoperitoneal shunt, lumboperitoneal shunt, optic nerve sheath fenestration, and dural venous sinus stenting, respectively, 8 even though it should be considered that CSF shunting has complications of its own: shunt obstruction, infections, need for revision, or CSF leak.…”