2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1098-3015(10)62878-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psr1 Cost-Effectiveness of Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in the Prevention of Ischemic Events in Stroke and Tia Patients: A Four-European Country Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 34 potentially relevant studies, 11 [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] met the criteria for inclusion in the cost-effectiveness review; one study 69 was also included in the SR that informed the previous guidance. 24 Of the 11 [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] included studies, seven [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] were published in full, whereas four 76-79 were available only in an abstract format. Most of the studies were of reasonable quality; however, more detail and focused critique of the clinical effectiveness evidence used to inform the economic evaluations would have improved the quality of the studies (see Appendix 2).…”
Section: Review Of Existing Cost-effectiveness Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 34 potentially relevant studies, 11 [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] met the criteria for inclusion in the cost-effectiveness review; one study 69 was also included in the SR that informed the previous guidance. 24 Of the 11 [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] included studies, seven [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] were published in full, whereas four 76-79 were available only in an abstract format. Most of the studies were of reasonable quality; however, more detail and focused critique of the clinical effectiveness evidence used to inform the economic evaluations would have improved the quality of the studies (see Appendix 2).…”
Section: Review Of Existing Cost-effectiveness Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five 69,71,72,74,76 of the 11 69-79 studies included were described as cost-effectiveness analyses and six 70,73,75,[77][78][79] as cost-utility analyses. The cost-effectiveness analyses have used a range of health outcomes including life saved, events avoided, life-years lived, time spent free of stroke recurrence or disability and life expectancy.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Economic Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations