Psychiatric Neurosurgery: A Survey on the Perceptions of Psychiatrists and Residents

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Objectives: To evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of psychiatrists and psychiatry residents regarding neurosurgical procedures for treating psychiatric disorders and to identify potential barriers to patient referral. Methods: A survey consisting of 25 questions was created using SurveyMonkey and was distributed to psychiatrists and psychiatry residents in Quebec. The study was approved by the McGill University Health Center’s Research Ethics Board. Descriptive statistics and Friedman’s test were performed using SPSS software. Results: A total of 99 participants, including 64 residents and 35 psychiatrists, completed more than 75% of the survey and were included in data analysis. Overall, participants were significantly (p < 0.0005) more comfortable in referring patients suffering from treatment-resistant obsessive–compulsive disorder than from treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and preferred to refer patients for deep brain stimulation (DBS) rather than for anterior cingulotomy/capsulotomy (AC). Only 11.43% of psychiatrists had ever referred a patient for AC or DBS, and 34.69% of respondents felt that these procedures were dangerous. Lack of knowledge (82.83%) was viewed as the principal limiting factor, and 57.58% of respondents identified ≥6 different barriers to patient referral. The majority of participants (69.39%) were interested in improving their knowledge on psychiatric neurosurgery, and 82.65% felt that this subject should be included in the psychiatry residency curriculum. Conclusion: Overall, participants acknowledged having many limitations to referring patients for neurosurgical interventions. While informative conferences discussing neuromodulation/neuroablation could easily address many barriers, further studies are required to assess how these could change attitudes and patterns of referral.

Neuromodulation in Psychiatric disorders: Experimental and Clinical evidence for reward and motivation network Deep Brain Stimulation: Focus on the medial forebrain bundle

“…However, as the hypotheses concerning particular disorders vary, so do the stimulation targets: OCD (7 targets tested), MDD (7), Tourette's (6), anorexia nervosa (4), addiction (3), anxiety (2), obesity (2) and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (1) (Lee et al., 2019). To date, DBS treatment has been approved only for OCD (receiving a Humanitarian Device Exemption from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008 to target the anterior limb of the internal capsule); stimulation in other psychiatric disorders, including Depression, fall under the “investigational” trial category (for summary of results, see Cleary et al., 2015; Cormier et al., 2019; Graat et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2019).…”

Examining cognitive change in magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound capsulotomy for psychiatric illness

“…These concerns may originate, in part, from the widespread mis-use and abuse of psychiatric surgery in the 1950s 27,28 . Despite the significant advances in the field (e.g., the advent of stereotaxy, MRI-guided targeting, and more strict ethical oversight), lesional procedures are still viewed as risky or dangerous by a substantial proportion of psychiatrists 29 and the general public 30 . Although numerous recent RF and SRS trials have been effective at improving psychiatric symptoms, several of these studies reported persistent postoperative difficulties on cognitive tasks, particularly on tests of executive function [31][32][33][34][35] .…”

Development of a Secure Website to Facilitate Information Sharing in Families at High Risk of Bowel Cancer—The Familyweb Study

“…In this phase, we wanted to explore participants’ experiences of being informed of the diagnosis and how that information was shared in the family. Data security of this sensitive information was ensured through (SG’s) password protected access to the responses submitted via SurveyMonkey, a platform considered sufficiently secure for health related surveys [ 62 , 63 , 64 ] and approved by the Ethics Committee within the study protocol [ 60 ].…”