Psychiatric readmissions and their association with environmental and health system characteristics: a systematic review of the literature

Abstract

BackgroundPsychiatric readmissions have been studied at length. However, knowledge about how environmental and health system characteristics affect readmission rates is scarce. This paper systemically reviews and discusses the impact of health and social systems as well as environmental characteristics for readmission after discharge from inpatient care for patients with a psychiatric diagnosis.MethodsComprehensive literature searches were conducted in the electronic bibliographic databases Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, ProQuest Health Management and OpenGrey. In addition, Google Scholar was utilised. Relevant publications published between January 1990 and June 2014 were included. No restrictions regarding language or publication status were imposed. A qualitative synthesis of the included studies was performed. Variables describing system and environmental characteristics were grouped into three groups: those capturing regulation, financing system and governance; those capturing capacity, organisation and structure; and those capturing environmental variables.ResultsOf the 734 unique articles identified in the original search, 35 were included in the study. There is a limited number of studies on psychiatric readmissions and their association with environmental and health system characteristics. Even though the review reveals an extensive list of characteristics studied, most characteristics appear in a very limited number of articles. The most frequently studied characteristics are related to location (local area, district/region/country). In most cases area differences were found, providing strong indication that the risk of readmission not only relates to patient characteristics but also to system and/or environmental factors that vary between areas. The literature also points in the direction of a negative association of institutional length of stay and community aftercare with readmission for psychiatric patients.ConclusionThis review shows that analyses of system level variables are scarce. Furthermore they differ with respect to purpose, choice of system characteristics and the way these characteristics are measured. The lack of studies looking at the relationship between readmissions and provider payment models is striking. Without the link to provider payment models and other health system characteristics related to regulation, financing system and governance structure it becomes more difficult to draw policy implications from these analyses.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1099-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The effects of a schizophrenia pay‐for‐performance program on patient outcomes in Taiwan

“…Our research yielded results similar to the findings of previous studies showing that high‐risk patients or patients with more diverse comorbidities present more adverse outcomes than other patients . Regarding socioeconomic status, our study demonstrated that patients with a regular job had fewer adverse outcomes than those without a regular job, which is similar to previous research showing that high quality‐of‐life scores positively correlate with the employment status of patients with schizophrenia …”

Mentally disordered offenders discharged from designated hospital facilities under the medical treatment and supervision act in Japan: Reoffending and readmission

“…Although length of stay might reflect treatment difficulties, it is likely that a court will order a discharge only when a patient has recovered, so on returning to the community, both long‐ and short‐stay patients should be similar in this respect. That said, Kalseth, Lassemo, Wahlbeck, Haaramo, and Magnussen () reported a negative correlation between length of inpatient stay and subsequent readmission.…”

Assessing psychiatric safety in suicidal emergency department patients

“…With hospital readmission as an important quality indicator, the 2010 Affordable Care Act developed the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, which requires reduced payments from Medicare and Medicaid to hospitals with excess readmissions for certain medical diagnoses . Although this program did not target psychiatric readmissions, these occur at much higher rates and are increasingly scrutinized from both a quality and cost standpoint.…”

“…Affordable Care Act developed the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, which requires reduced payments from Medicare and Medicaid to hospitals with excess readmissions for certain medical diagnoses. 43 Although this program did not target psychiatric readmissions, these occur at much higher rates and are increasingly scrutinized from both a quality and cost standpoint. Many of the risk factors for readmission that are peripheral to the primary medical diagnosis of patients are the primary risk factors for psychiatric hospitalization, including mental illness diagnosis, substance use, and a poor socioeconomic situation.…”