2016
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.191994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychiatrists' responsibilities with regards to patients' fitness to drive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study from the United Kingdom exploring whether the mental health practitioners were assessing their patients’ fitness-to-drive and addressing the issue as guided by the relevant agencies and legislation found that there was a poor compliance with the standards among assessing clinicians. [6] Another study exploring the practices of Canadian psychiatrists regarding fitness-to-drive in individuals with mental illness found that only 18.0% of respondents were always aware of whether their patients were active drivers. [7] The above study results indicate that there is a clear need for education and guidelines to assist psychiatrists in decision making about driving fitness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study from the United Kingdom exploring whether the mental health practitioners were assessing their patients’ fitness-to-drive and addressing the issue as guided by the relevant agencies and legislation found that there was a poor compliance with the standards among assessing clinicians. [6] Another study exploring the practices of Canadian psychiatrists regarding fitness-to-drive in individuals with mental illness found that only 18.0% of respondents were always aware of whether their patients were active drivers. [7] The above study results indicate that there is a clear need for education and guidelines to assist psychiatrists in decision making about driving fitness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The July–September 2016 issue of the Indian J Psychiatry carried eight original articles. Of these, one[ 1 ] provided only a range of values for the age of the participants, and another[ 2 ] provided no description of the sample, at all. These are serious limitations of a manuscript because, without descriptive information about the sample, readers cannot know to what population the results of a study may be generalized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%