Psychoanalytic therapists are today far more aware of countertransference effects, intersubjectivity, and mutual influence. The area that has been explored least in this two-person appreciation of psychoanalytic process is the effect of the psychodynamics of the therapist in a wide sense-that is, how the therapist brings a whole psychology, with a wide array of potential transferences, to each treatment. Triggered by the unexpected announcement of a patient's expecting a baby, the author reviewed his practice and found that a large portion of his women patients ages 30-45 had become pregnant during therapy or psychoanalysis. The particulars were varied: how much the patient wanted a baby, whether the treatment was psychotherapy or psychoanalysis, the patients' personality structure. Was the analyst's psychology a common factor? The paper presents three quite different case examples and examines whether and how the author's developmental and inner experience of women, sexuality, pregnancy could have contributed to a dyadic process that, in turn, could lead to pregnancy. If such effects happen, then it is important to look beyond and behind "anonymity" and "neutrality," as well as momentary countertransferences, to the real-life effects that we have in our treatments.In the course of 40 years of clinical work I have, naturally, seen quite a few women in the child-bearing years. My subjective sense, looking back, is that a disproportionate number of these women have gotten pregnant. 1 The individual situations are tremendously varied, and there is no way to prove my assertion of "disproportionate." Even if there have been an unusually large number of pregnancies, basing this impression on the experience of one analyst makes it impossible to know whether this is simply a statistical aberration, or, on the other hand, whether it is unremarkable, typical for the age range of my particular population of women patients. In this paper I ask the reader to accept the possibility that this was unusual. Was I the common factor? Could I be working, interacting with women patients in some way that made pregnancy likely? 1 A very rough review of my practice suggests that more than one third of the patients in the possible group got pregnant during treatment, and another third had a child subsequently (letting me know), for a total of two thirds of the total. My impression is also that this proportion increased to roughly half, as my practice continued, and I saw more women in the latter part of the child-bearing years (ages 30-45). As a baseline comparison, the average child-bearing rate for the age group 30-45 in recent years is 5.5%/year. If my treatment contacts averaged 5 years in length, the "control group" rate would be 28%. My patient population tended to be in the 35-to 45-year-old range, where the "control" rate would be 17%.Correspondence should be addressed to Richard Almond, M.D.,