Psychoanalysis and Family Systems Revisited: the Old, Old Story?

Abstract

Psychoanalysis and family systems revisited: the old, old story?Christopher Dare a This paper explores some commonalities in the current state of psychoanalysis and family therapy in Britain. It argues that there have been social changes within Britain that have increased the popularity of the practices and concepts of psychotherapy and counselling. The methods and ideas of psychoanalysis seem to be the major influence in this process which is manifest, for the most part, within private therapy and counselling and in the universities. It appears that family therapists and the institutes of psychoanalysis act as if unaware of this pragmatic acceptance of psychoanalytic thinking. The two disciplines of family therapy and psychoanalysis remain organizationally and conceptually disassociated from each other despite the two subjects having considerable overlap, plying adjacent trades and using theoretical ideas which show considerable parallels. The paper proposes that postmodern thinking is, potentially, an evolving link between the two forms of thinking and therapy but that the theories of both psychoanalysis and family therapy require empirical evaluation.

The role of romantic attachment and self‐criticism and dependency for the relationship satisfaction of community adults

“…In this context, contributions of both object-relational psychodynamic approaches (e.g. Dare, 1998;Donovan, 2003;Flaskas, 1997;Gerson, 1996;Kaslow, 2001;Pocock, 2006) as well as the related attachment paradigm (Akister and Reibstein, 2004;Byng-Hall, 1997;Clulow, 2001;Kozlowska and Hanney, 2002) have been extensively discussed.…”

Editorial

“…Christopher Dare (1998) suggests that both are therapeutic practices which are theory driven rather than pragmatic. Both emphasise self-reflection and the need to create a reflective space for thinking about different points of view.…”