2019
DOI: 10.1075/lab.19025.azp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psycholinguistic approaches to production and comprehension in bilingual adults and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This production-comprehension asymmetry has recently been challenged by the findings of a ‘reverse asymmetry’ in various languages – that is, higher production compared to comprehension levels (Hendriks & Spenader, 2006; Johnson, de Villiers & Seymour, 2004; Pérez-Leroux, 2005; Ünal & Papafragou, 2016), and symmetrical acquisition of both modalities (Ruigendijk, Friedmann, Novogrodsky & Balaban, 2010). Thus, the precise relationship between comprehension and production is still a matter of debate (Azpiroz, Allen, Katsika, & Fernandez, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This production-comprehension asymmetry has recently been challenged by the findings of a ‘reverse asymmetry’ in various languages – that is, higher production compared to comprehension levels (Hendriks & Spenader, 2006; Johnson, de Villiers & Seymour, 2004; Pérez-Leroux, 2005; Ünal & Papafragou, 2016), and symmetrical acquisition of both modalities (Ruigendijk, Friedmann, Novogrodsky & Balaban, 2010). Thus, the precise relationship between comprehension and production is still a matter of debate (Azpiroz, Allen, Katsika, & Fernandez, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%