“…Fifth, the research community's reaction to findings that minority groups are superior is often to declare such findings "counterintuitive" or a "paradox," indicating an undeclared presumption that minorities were expected to be inferior on the selected criteria variables (e.g., De Maio, 2010;Hummer, Powers, Pullum, Gossman, & Frisbie, 2007;Markides & Coreil, 1986;Sam, Vedder, Liebkind, Neto, & Virta, 2008). Large-N studies, especially those based on representative population samples, often produce data showing immigrants to have mental and physical health better than that of the dominant society (e.g., Abu-Rayya, 2013;De Maio, 2010;Harker, 2001;Kwak & Rudmin, 2014;Read, Amick, & Donato, 2005). In a study using 42 opportunistic samples of adolescents in 13 nations, Berry, Phinney, Sam, and Vedder (2006, p. 284) tabled data showing that, in each of the 13 nations studied, the minority adolescents had lower scores than their national peers on psychological problems and behavior problems and higher scores on school adjustment.…”