Psychological aspects of the relationship of consciousness mechanisms and individualization of learning

Abstract

The article covers the problem of the relationship of teacher’s consciousness and the individualization of learning. Special attention is paid to the historical aspects of the problem of individualization of education and its various interpretations in the works of researchers. It is shown that today the situation of social uncertainty, which requires a person to constantly choose a social position, action, way of achieving their goals, stands behind the problem of educational individualization. The professional consciousness of the teacher is considered as a form of life of the subject, providing a solution to professional problems in the process of teaching. Taking into account the relationship between consciousness and the individualization of learning, the authors show how this problem is resolved when the reflection and goal-setting mechanisms are included in the paradigm of joint activities between a teacher and a student, ensuring the development of professional and pedagogical consciousness at the stage of higher education. Thus, educational and professional activities and mechanisms for the development of consciousness of subjects of activity, conditioning each other, find their place in the context of solving problems of implementing the individualization of learning of the subject (child).

Toxic communication as a risk factor when promoting Health, Safety & Environmental culture in an organization

“…For this influence to be beneficial to the organization, managers need to consistently demonstrate behaviors and characteristics of strong HSE leadership" [3]. However, both in Russia and Armenia, the development of HSE culture is accompanied by a number of difficulties of a psychological [4] and organizational and communicative nature. On the one hand, employees doubt the sincerity of managers' desire of to take care of staff and the environment, they do not believe in the effectiveness of feedback from management, sometimes neglect the requirements of safety and labor protection, demonstrate resistance to these requirements and do not report the violations to the management and relevant services.…”