2022
DOI: 10.22605/rrh6909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological factors of diet quality among rural populations of Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Introduction:This study aimed to determine the relationship between symptoms of anxiety and/or anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure) and diet quality during confinement due to COVID-19 in rural populations in Latin America. Methods: This was a multicentric, cross-sectional study. An online survey was applied, which included the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale for assessing the presence of anhedonia, the Food Intake Questionnaire and sociodemographic questions. Results:The study included… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, food shortages, especially of fresh fruits and vegetables, may have obligated many families to adjust their diets [ 43 , 44 ], with more families opting for food with longer shelf-lives [ 42 ]. Other factors contributing to poor quality diet include overall financial constraints due to loss of jobs, limited financial resources to stockpile food, more people to feed at home, inability to participate in food pantries and/or congregate meals, and social isolation [ 39 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, food shortages, especially of fresh fruits and vegetables, may have obligated many families to adjust their diets [ 43 , 44 ], with more families opting for food with longer shelf-lives [ 42 ]. Other factors contributing to poor quality diet include overall financial constraints due to loss of jobs, limited financial resources to stockpile food, more people to feed at home, inability to participate in food pantries and/or congregate meals, and social isolation [ 39 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed an analysis of mental health in 5,976 rural dwellers from four countries of Latin America, in 14 studies, where Peru had the biggest proportion of participants ( n = 2,359) ( 19 32 ). We also included a regional-wide study that analyzed 708 adults from Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Mexico ( 32 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed an analysis of mental health in 5,976 rural dwellers from four countries of Latin America, in 14 studies, where Peru had the biggest proportion of participants ( n = 2,359) ( 19 32 ). We also included a regional-wide study that analyzed 708 adults from Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Mexico ( 32 ). In addition, five studies from Peru (33.3%) ( 27 – 31 ), four studies from Ecuador (26.6%) ( 22 – 25 ), three from Colombia (20%) ( 19 – 21 ), and a study from Paraguay ( 26 ) were included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies evaluated the association between a ‘traditional’ diet, which varied based on the geographic location, and anxiety, with 3 reporting a significant inverse association [ 61 63 ], 6 showing no association [ 64 69 ], and one study noting a significant inverse association for women while no association was noted for men [ 70 ]. The relationship between diet quality score and anxiety was examined in 9 studies, with 4 studies showing significant inverse associations [ 52 , 71 73 ], 4 indicating no association [ 7 , 63 , 74 , 75 ], and 1 study reporting a significant inverse association among women but no association among men [ 70 ]. Associations between a vegetarian/vegan diet and anxiety in 9 studies were inconsistent, with 2 reporting positive significant associations [ 62 , 76 ], 4 noting a significant inverse association [ 77 80 ], and 3 indicating no significant associations [ 34 , 47 , 81 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%