2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19 adversity: Associations with distress

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to hardship for individuals across the globe, and research to-date has indicated a significant impact of the pandemic on mental health functioning. In order to promote psychological resilience during this time, it is important to understand modifiable targets for clinical intervention. The current study examined demographic characteristics, pandemic-related adversity, and psychological flexibility in relation to general and peritraumatic distress in a sample of United States surve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
61
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our multiple group SEM analysis highlights the role of psychological flexibility as the only significant factor that mediated the relationship between illness perceptions toward COVID-19 and mental health across all included geographical regions. Indeed, several recent studies conducted in Italy [ 37 ], the United Kingdom [ 38 , 39 ], the United States [ 40 , 41 , 42 ], and Poland [ 43 ] have indicated how the facets of psychological flexibility play an important role in mitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 ]. Of the aforementioned studies, some have further shown that the opposite processes of psychological flexibility, that is, the psychological inflexibility or experiential avoidance were positively associated with parenting stress and family discord [ 44 ], and moderated the suicidal risk in the context of COVID-19 stressors such as resource constraints and loss arising from the pandemic [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our multiple group SEM analysis highlights the role of psychological flexibility as the only significant factor that mediated the relationship between illness perceptions toward COVID-19 and mental health across all included geographical regions. Indeed, several recent studies conducted in Italy [ 37 ], the United Kingdom [ 38 , 39 ], the United States [ 40 , 41 , 42 ], and Poland [ 43 ] have indicated how the facets of psychological flexibility play an important role in mitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 ]. Of the aforementioned studies, some have further shown that the opposite processes of psychological flexibility, that is, the psychological inflexibility or experiential avoidance were positively associated with parenting stress and family discord [ 44 ], and moderated the suicidal risk in the context of COVID-19 stressors such as resource constraints and loss arising from the pandemic [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are confirmed by the WHO, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other organizations that promote mindfulness practices during the pandemic [ 8 , 62 ]. Additionally, prior studies suggest that psychological flexibility is a significant protective factor against the adverse effects of general and peritraumatic distress [ 63 ]. This study sheds new light on this notion as psychological flexibility appears to have an indirect relationship with pandemic-related anxiety by promoting better psychosomatic functioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological exibility and the ability to stay in the present moment and participate in the value-oriented activities, even in the presence of negative emotions in a pandemic situation, turned out to be a positive factor. It has been shown that components such as behavioral awareness and openness to new experiences were associated with lower levels of distress (Kroska, Roche, Adamowicz, & Stegall, 2020). A study conducted on a British sample during the lockdown in May 2020 demonstrated that psychological exibility explained 5 to 18% of the variance of distress (including that speci c to COVID-19) and psychological well-being (Dawson & Golijani-Moghaddam, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%