Psychological Science Accelerator Data Management Bylaws

Forscher, Patrick S.; Aczél, Balázs; Cr, Chartier; Musser, Erica D.; Kt, Horstmann; Je, Grahe; Kekecs, Zoltán; Corker, Katherine S.; Sirota, M; Vaughn, Leigh Ann; Al, Wichman; Papadatou-Pastou, M; Evans, Thomas Rhys; Szecsi, P; Storage, D; Pfuhl, Gerit; Borghi, John; Urry, Heather L.; Pm, Isager; Moshontz, Hannah; IJzerman, Hans; Jk, Flake

doi:10.31234/osf.io/buqyc

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This way, the team members will find all the necessary files easily and the chance of redundant work or loss of materials decreases. A good example of a standard repository structure for projects can be found in the Psychological Science Accelerator's data management bylaws (Forscher et al, 2019).…”

Section: Standard Research Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lab manuals for efficient and high quality science in a happy and safe work environment

Kovács¹,

Jaquiery²,

Algermissen³

et al. 2022

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The culture and norms of research laboratories can greatly influence the quality of scientific outputs produced by the lab and the well-being of its members. In most labs, the culture that governs how individual researchers behave in their work is often implicit and situational. In contrast, some labs develop their own lab manual, a written document that outlines their standard functioning. Such a lab manual can ensure that lab members have a shared and mutual understanding of who they are and how they do things. We argue that every lab could benefit from a lab manual because it facilitates efficient collaboration, reduces potential research mistakes, and aids the integration of new good research practices.Developing a lab manual without a doubt requires extra effort. To decrease researchers’ burden of creating their own lab manual, we provide a lab manual template that outlines the different topics that could be included in a manual. Moreover, we introduce an easy-to-use web app, blueprint, that further simplifies the process of creating a lab manual using our template. The present paper aims to serve as a guide for those who would like to partake in this endeavor.

show abstract

Section: Standard Research Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lab manuals for efficient and high quality science in a happy and safe work environment

Kovács¹,

Jaquiery²,

Algermissen³

et al. 2022

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Psychological Science Accelerator: A Promising Resource for Clinical Psychological Science

Beshears

Gjoneska²,

Schmidt³

et al. 2022

Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three Persistent Myths about Open Science

Syed

2024

JOTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge and implementation of open science principles and behaviors remains uneven across the sciences, despite over 10 years of intensive education and advocacy. One reason for the slow and uneven progress of the open science movement is a set of closely held myths about the implications of open science practices, bolstered by recurring objections and arguments that have long been addressed. This paper covers three of these major recurring myths: 1) that open science conflicts with prioritizing diversity, 2) that “open data” is a binary choice between fully open and accessible and completely closed off, and 3) that preregistration is only appropriate for certain types of research designs. Putting these myths to rest is necessary as we work towards improving our scientific practice.

show abstract

Psychological Science Accelerator Data Management Bylaws

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Lab manuals for efficient and high quality science in a happy and safe work environment

Lab manuals for efficient and high quality science in a happy and safe work environment

Psychological Science Accelerator: A Promising Resource for Clinical Psychological Science

Three Persistent Myths about Open Science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About