We discuss how six dimensions of the authentizotic psychological climate explain stress and affective well-being at work, and how stress and affective well-being explain self-reported individual performance. The sample comprises 199 employees from 118 organizations. The findings indicate the good psychometric properties of the authentizotic climate measure, and suggest that (a) affective well-being, mainly enthusiasm and vigor, explain unique variance of selfreported performance and (b) the perceptions of authentizotic climates explain unique variance of stress, affective well-being and self-reported performance. A configurational approach is also presented for dealing with the ways people combine their perceptions of authentizotic climates, emotional states, stress and self-reported performance.Keywords: authentizotic psychological climate; stress; affective well-being at work; self-reported individual performance 3 In a paper on the value of happiness in the workplace, Gavin and Mason (2004) stressed that economic productivity has been extracted from the average worker, in large measure, at the cost of his/her health and happiness and that this trend towards dysfunctional effects needs to be reversed.This reversion is what the "positive organization studies" movement (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000;Luthans, 2002;Cameron et al., 2003) have been looking for. It suggests that more efforts must be devoted to developing people's strengths, to help people achieve happiness and to contribute to make life meaningful. Gavin and Mason (2004) illustrated their arguments with companies ranked in Fortune's "100 best companies to work for". This ranking, published in several countries, considers five dimensions as characteristic of the good workplace: credibility, respect, fairness, pride and camaraderie. The ranking affords the idea a great deal of attention, with featured companies serving as potential benchmarks to organizations in search of improvement and good publicity. The presence in the ranking may be a significant source of reputation in the job market in this era of "war for talent" . The model represents the popular expression of a focus on the human side of the organization, which is also present in projects such as the Best Companies for Working Mothers and APA's Psychologically
Healthy Workplace Award.A useful dialogue between the managerial and scholarly fields can be seen in the interest shown by the academia in the positive impact of "best places to work for" on organizational performance (Filbeck & Preece, 2003;Fulmer et al., 2003). One prominent example of this dialogue arose when Kets de Vries' (2001) notion of the "authentizotic organization" to capture the essence of these workplaces. "Authentizotic" is a neologism that combines the Greek words "authentekos" and "zoteekos", meaning that an organization is trustful and reliant, and vital to life, respectively.The idea underpinning the authentizotic theory is that organizations can be a source of meaning and growth for people, instead of l...