2017
DOI: 10.1080/10413200.2016.1272650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological States Underlying Excellent Performance in Sport: Toward an Integrated Model of Flow and Clutch States

Abstract: This study investigated the psychological states underlying excellent performance in 26 athletes (M age = 29 years, SD = 7.7) across a range of sports (team, net/wall, sprint, endurance, adventure) and standards (world class to recreational). Participants were primarily interviewed on average 4 days after excellent performances. The data were analyzed thematically. Distinct states of flow and clutch were reported, each of which occurred through separate contexts and processes, while athletes also transitioned … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
104
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
104
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When stronger methodologies, which capture more recent data about specific flow states, are employed a different picture emerges. Swann et al (2016Swann et al ( , 2017a and have conducted "event-focused" interviews as soon as possible after a specific performance (on average four days later in these studies), through which the perspective of flow and clutch states emerged.…”
Section: Methodological Issues In Flow Research In Sport and Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When stronger methodologies, which capture more recent data about specific flow states, are employed a different picture emerges. Swann et al (2016Swann et al ( , 2017a and have conducted "event-focused" interviews as soon as possible after a specific performance (on average four days later in these studies), through which the perspective of flow and clutch states emerged.…”
Section: Methodological Issues In Flow Research In Sport and Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, clutch states are characterized by complete and deliberate focus on the task, whereas flow is characterized by effortless attention; clutch states involve heightened awareness of the situation and its demands, whereas flow involves positive feedback and feelings that "everything is going to plan"; and clutch states involve intense effort, in contrast to flow which is characterized by an effortless, automatic experience. Common to both states, however, are the experiences of enjoyment, enhanced motivation, perceived control, altered perceptions of time and the environment, absorption, and confidence (Swann et al, 2017a). These findings have been summarized as a "tentative solution" (i.e., a starting point for further testing and refinement; Popper, 1959) in an Integrated Model of Flow and Clutch States (Swann et al, 2017a), which also described the contexts, processes of occurrence, and outcomes of each state (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Does the Flow Conceptualization Conflate Two Distinct Psychomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of psychological factors that may influence the performance of athletes has been a subject of study in recent decades in numerous disciplines [1][2][3]. There is a growing understanding of how aspects such as competitive anxiety, motivation, moods, flow states, and self-efficacy relate to each other [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays it is well known that psychological variables are quite significant aspects in sports performance, both in elite and amateur athletes (Morris, 2000; MacNamara et al, 2010; Castilla and Ramos, 2012; Abdullah et al, 2016; Swann et al, 2017). The role of psychological characteristics is relevant not only due to its direct impact on athlete’s performance (e.g., coping with or choking under stress), but also as a mediator between the athlete’s physical, technical, and tactical skills and his/her performance in competition, whether positively or negatively (Mahamud et al, 2005; Anderson et al, 2014; Arthur et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%