Linguistic and Literary Studies, Vol 1, General and Theoretical Linguistics 1978
DOI: 10.1515/9783110808995.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychologismus Und Objektivismus in Der Sprachwissenschaft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buddhists have long held the doctrine of the "inherent non-substantiality" of things (Dalai Lama, 1999, p. 109) and that objects regarded as discrete are not so, but are recognised because of the fact that by convention we give names to parts of the world. Antal (1976) pointed out that we think of the Danube as a single "thing" but that in reality "it" is constantly changing in various ways; it is the name that gives a sense of constancy and sameness to the river. That is another of the problems in the relation of reference − where does an "object", such as a river, or plane journey begin and end?…”
Section: Misleading Aspects Of Language and The Objectification Of Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buddhists have long held the doctrine of the "inherent non-substantiality" of things (Dalai Lama, 1999, p. 109) and that objects regarded as discrete are not so, but are recognised because of the fact that by convention we give names to parts of the world. Antal (1976) pointed out that we think of the Danube as a single "thing" but that in reality "it" is constantly changing in various ways; it is the name that gives a sense of constancy and sameness to the river. That is another of the problems in the relation of reference − where does an "object", such as a river, or plane journey begin and end?…”
Section: Misleading Aspects Of Language and The Objectification Of Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antal, 1971;1976;Kac, 1974;Itkonen, 1978;and Katz, 1981), then the issue of creativity is placed in quite a different light. If, for instance, one holds the view that competence is the individual knowledge of a language, whereas language itself is an objective phenomenon, then the question is immediately raised as to what or who is creative: the language or the speaker.…”
Section: Laszlo Antal--------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%