Psychologists’ Experiences Who Managed Waitlists in Mental-Health Services During the COVID-19 Lockdown

Abstract

Abstract. Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the demand for mental-health services worldwide. Consequently, it also increased the length of the waitlists for mental-health services, putting a strain on adult mental-health services (AMHS) and the healthcare professionals dealing with these lists. There is little research about how psychologists managed waitlist practices, e.g., scheduling screening appointments, determining clients’ availability in an offered appointment, providing evidence-based bibliotherapy, or using priority waiting scales. It remains unclear what their experiences were with these practices and how effective these practices were during the pandemic. Method: The current convergent, concurrent mixed-method study investigated waitlist-management practices, synthesizing quantitative and qualitative data from an online survey ( n = 20 participants) applied in two local AMHS in Ireland. Results: The most common practices used by psychologists were opt-in systems, maintaining regular contact with clients, informing them about the waiting time, and providing evidence-based bibliotherapy. Screening was the least-used practice. The qualitative analysis highlights the emotional burden psychologists experienced from the use of waitlist practices, particularly when they had to inform the client of the waiting time or put a client back onto a waitlist. Discussion: Psychologists reported a lack of resources and increases in administrative workload as barriers to implementing practices. Managerial, organizational, and policy-based recommendations are proposed.

LeadinCare: A Qualitative Informed Digital Training Platform Development to Increase Physicians’ Soft Communication Skills After COVID-19

“…The study findings are in line with recent similar research indicating the barriers and enables in maintaining good health care professionals and patients relationships (McDonnell et al, 2022;Vogt et al, 2023). Some contextual and environmental issues, such as staffing pressures and ongoing workload existed to a large degree before the pandemic but deteriorated by it.…”

A qualitative feasibility and acceptability study of an acceptance and commitment-based bibliotherapy intervention for people with cancer

“…Notably, our findings indicate time-delivery issues. Professionals can recommend bibliotherapy around the time treatment ends, either alone or alongside mild distress or while waiting for professional support ( Kangas and Gross, 2020 ; McDonnell et al, 2022 ; Macía et al, 2022 ). There is a need for further investigation of the combination of delivery mode and psychological approaches ( Caruso and Breitbart, 2020 ) to support the present study findings.…”

Burdens and resources of Austrian clinical psychologists: results of a qualitative study two years into the COVID-19 pandemic

“…For example, a study on 1,547 psychotherapists in Austria indicated that their stress level was higher during the pandemic than reference values measured in the general German population before the pandemic [ 21 ]. Possible stressors included fear of infection in direct patient contact or changes in everyday practice such as switching to remote psychotherapy, working with a mask, dealing with waiting lists due to increased need for psychotherapeutic treatment, or changes in patient's existing symptoms [ 22 , 23 ]. Similarly, Rosen et al [ 24 ] reported increased burnout among psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic.…”