Context and Dynamics in Clinical Knowledge, a somber title for a very approachable, engaging collection of essays documenting the fate of medical encounters, is organized as follows: a number of clinical vignettes presented with the family physician in mind, concerned with family life, drugs, and alcohol; sandwiched between theoretical pieces that explore the central theme, namely the inherent subjectivity of medicine, conveyed by the terms transference and countertransference, which "connote the effect of unconscious forces upon feelings, thoughts, and behavior in any social situation." Thus, "we are seduced, in the widest sense of the term, only by those patients we unconsciously seek to be seduced by-only to blame them for the entire matter." Stein and Apprey are of an obvious psychoanalytic persuasion, a point of view that may seem foreign to family medicine, but these authors win us over with a tone not at all similar to that of a classical analyst. They do not live in dread of instinctual sexual/aggressive urges, nor do they rail against the dangers of becoming overly involved with patients. If anything, we are pleasantly surprised to find out that the instinctual life of the healer is an intrinsic part of the medical encounter that may even be said to fuel the medical interaction. The authors get us to see that a physician without countertransference issues would be dead, a machinelike robot that merely cuts tissue and dispenses medications. Like it or not, the unspoken, irrational desires of the physician, his patient, and the family seem to talk with one another from outside of anyone's awareness, shaping the destiny of the medical encounter. Stein and Apprey are optimists who believe that the physician who can look at himself closely, who can first come to grips with his own humanity, will be able to limit the distortion associated with countertransference. But the physician's subjectivity is only one part of the story.Stein and Apprey are also strongly committed to an ethnographic approach that argues for the role of context, that is to say, practices and traditions, collectively experienced, that define who is ill, who should receive treatment,