2018
DOI: 10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychology-Based Models of Asset Prices and Trading Volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 357 publications
(368 reference statements)
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important consideration, since it allows for rich patterns of belief formation. See Barberis (2018) and Gennaioli and Shleifer (2018) for recent accounts of the importance of non-fully rational expectation formation. That said, any results presented in the form of Kalman gains rely on the assumption that the external observer faces Gaussian uncertainty and uses Bayesian updating.…”
Section: Proposition 2 (Identifying Relative Price Informativeness)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important consideration, since it allows for rich patterns of belief formation. See Barberis (2018) and Gennaioli and Shleifer (2018) for recent accounts of the importance of non-fully rational expectation formation. That said, any results presented in the form of Kalman gains rely on the assumption that the external observer faces Gaussian uncertainty and uses Bayesian updating.…”
Section: Proposition 2 (Identifying Relative Price Informativeness)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another prominent line, also partly motivated by Shiller, stresses non-rational beliefs, limits to arbitrage, and fads that move equity prices in ways not fully tethered to real investment opportunities. 2 See Cochrane (2017) and Barberis (2018) for recent reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second set of applications is, instead, exactly focused on risk. In finance, Nicholas Barberis, in a series of influential papers, has made the case that prospect theory can make sense of a variety of anomalies, including the equity premium and the performance of IPOs (Barberis, Huang, and Santos, 2001; Barberis, 2018). For insurance choice, Sydnor (2010) and then Barseghyan et al (2013) put forward a model to explain the preference of insurers for low-deductible plans even when the extra premium is high.…”
Section: Making It Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barseghyan et al (2013) for example attributes much of the preference for low-deductible insurance to the overweighting of small probabilities. Barberis (2018) makes the case that probability weighting can explain preference for skewed investments, such as IPOs.…”
Section: Making It Workmentioning
confidence: 99%