“…Medford et al (2020) analyzed COVID-19 related tweets to understand different content types such as emotional, racially prejudiced, xenophobic or content that causes fear. Other recent work includes identifying low-credibility information using data from social media (Yang et al, 2020), detecting prejudice (Vidgen et al, 2020), finding challenges related to data, tools, and ethical issues (Ding et al, 2020), analyzing the spread of COVID-19 misinformation in relation to culture, society, and politics (Leng et al, 2021), detecting the spread of misleading information and the credibility of users who propagate it (Mourad et al, 2020), identifying positive influencers to propagate information (Pastor-Escuredo and Tarazona, 2020), analyzing the users who spread misinformation and the propagation of misinformation (Shahi et al, 2021), analyzing psychometric aspects in relation to the COVID-19 infodemic (Aggrawal et al, 2021), developing a multilingual COVID- The above research has focused on addressing one or more aspects of the infodemic (e.g., factuality). The work by Song et al (2021) addresses several aspects of COVID-19 related disinformation, where they collected false and misleading claims about COVID-19 from IFCN Poynter and annotated them as, public authority, community spread and impact, medical advice, self-treatments, and virus effects, prominent actors, conspiracies, virus transmission, virus origins and properties, public reaction, and vaccines, medical treatments, and tests.…”