2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the brief illness perception questionnaire in breast cancer survivors

Abstract: ObjectiveThe eight-item Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) supposedly evaluates cognitive and emotional representations of illness. This study examined the validity and reliability of a traditional Chinese version of the B-IPQ in Hong Kong Chinese breast cancer survivors.Methods358 Chinese breast cancer survivors who had recently ended their primary treatment completed this B-IPQ Chinese version. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the factor structure. The internal consistency, construct, pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of survivors with recurrent disease may have inflated the results of the current study because these individuals were likely allocated to the pessimistic IPs group and inevitably had poorer health outcomes. Furthermore, our composite BIPQ scale was based on a factor structure that was similar to that of other studies, [22][23][24][25] but does not support the theoretical model by Leventhal et al that presents emotional and cognitive representations as distinct factors. 33 As a consequence, the groups in the current study were not only based on cognitive perceptions regarding disease severity, such as perceptions of how long the disease will continue, but also on emotional representations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The inclusion of survivors with recurrent disease may have inflated the results of the current study because these individuals were likely allocated to the pessimistic IPs group and inevitably had poorer health outcomes. Furthermore, our composite BIPQ scale was based on a factor structure that was similar to that of other studies, [22][23][24][25] but does not support the theoretical model by Leventhal et al that presents emotional and cognitive representations as distinct factors. 33 As a consequence, the groups in the current study were not only based on cognitive perceptions regarding disease severity, such as perceptions of how long the disease will continue, but also on emotional representations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The scale most widely used is the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), validated with a sample of patients with chronic diseases (asthma, liver, and diabetes), is made up of 38 items. The nine-item brief version (BIP-Q) [16], has also been widely used [12,22,23]. The original questionnaire measures identity, cause, timeline, consequences, and control/cure.…”
Section: Perceived Threat From Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original questionnaire measures identity, cause, timeline, consequences, and control/cure. Studies have proven the usefulness of both the original version and the brief questionnaire for exploring perception of the disease in different areas of health [12,16,23,24]. Later, Moss-Morris et al [17] revised the original questionnaire to extend it to the cognitive and affective dimensions of disease perception in the Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised (IPQ-R) with 70 items.…”
Section: Perceived Threat From Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, B-IPQ has been validated for different conditions and languages [29][30][31][32][33][34], although only lately translated to Swedish for use in adolescents with ADHD [14]. The B-IPQ [21] covers five domains: identity, timeline, cause, control and consequences [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%