2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02446-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric characteristics of the WHOQOL-SRPB Scale in a population of stroke survivors and caregivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response to each item is given on a 5‐point scale (1 = impossible, 2 = a little, 3 = general, 4 = strong, 5 = completely). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better QOL 21 . The internal reliability (Cronbach's α) coefficient of WHOQOL in this study was 0.843.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The response to each item is given on a 5‐point scale (1 = impossible, 2 = a little, 3 = general, 4 = strong, 5 = completely). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better QOL 21 . The internal reliability (Cronbach's α) coefficient of WHOQOL in this study was 0.843.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…İnci and Temel found that resilience is effective at reducing complaints about physical pain and mental suffering from patients with stroke after surgical treatment and can alleviate care‐related fatigue among caregivers 47 . Caregivers with greater internal mental strength were reported to experience less pressure, engage in better decision‐making, and have enhanced QOL 21 . Thus, resilience is a critical psychological resource that can improve QOL among caregivers of inpatients with stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frequency, percentage, means and standard deviations (SD) were used to describe socio-demographic characteristics of midwives. For the reliability of SHMS V1.0, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability were performed by Cronbach's alpha coe cient and Pearson correlation coe cient, with values of at least 0.70 indicating acceptable reliability [33]. For the validity of SHMS V1.0, project analysis (item-total correlation) was used to test the homogeneity of each dimension and subscale, with the correlation coe cient greater than 0.40 considered as acceptable homogeneity [30]; the concurrent validity was evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis with FS-14, with the effect size as "Low" (the value of correlation coe cient varied around 0.1), "Medium" (the value of correlation coe cient varied around 0.30) and "Large" (the value of correlation coe cient varied more than 0.50) [34]; and the construct validity was performed by CFA, with the factor loadings being at least 0.40 indicating a su cient correlation [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they have a greater demand of core EF. The reliability index provided by the ordinal alpha [88][89][90][91] shows an acceptable level of internal consistency (α > 0.70). In summary, this preliminary study offers promising indicators of reliability and construct validity.…”
Section: The Basic Activities Of Daily Living Assessment In Preschool...mentioning
confidence: 99%