2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52366.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Comparisons of the Timed Up and Go, One‐Leg Stand, Functional Reach, and Tinetti Balance Measures in Community‐Dwelling Older People

Abstract: According to psychometric properties, the most suitable performance measure for evaluating balance in community-dwelling older people was the TB, followed by the TUG.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
311
3
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
18
311
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, those with TPPM >2.2°consistently demonstrated poor balance, mobility, and physical function. In older persons, the single-leg stance time has been consistently shown to be associated with negative health events (Vellas et al 1997;Jonsson et al 2004;Lin et al 2004). Further, the deterioration of balance in single-leg stance in young individuals with ankle sprain is proposed to be associated with ankle instability due to proprioceptive impairment (Akbari et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, those with TPPM >2.2°consistently demonstrated poor balance, mobility, and physical function. In older persons, the single-leg stance time has been consistently shown to be associated with negative health events (Vellas et al 1997;Jonsson et al 2004;Lin et al 2004). Further, the deterioration of balance in single-leg stance in young individuals with ankle sprain is proposed to be associated with ankle instability due to proprioceptive impairment (Akbari et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TUG test used in the present study possesses all advantages which is contained in MSW test as described previously [5], such as proven correlation with balance function [13][14][15], being a quantitative assessment, good reproducibility [12][13][14]16], short measurement time, and low cost. Furthermore, this test possesses proven differences between fall and non-fall groups [7,[14][15][16], high sensitivity and specificity [14][15][16], applicability to the elderly [7,[12][13][14][15][16], and no requirement for wide space. In addition, This test requires rapid acceleration and deceleration, a turn during high-speed walking, and rapid sitting down with a turn, and, therefore, seems to be more suitable for assessing comprehensive motor function more closely associated with balance function than the MSW test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test was performed three times with eyes open and closed and with both legs, taking into account the mean value of the measures for each condition (eyes open or closed). This procedure has high inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.93) 32 . Dynamic balance was evaluated by Maximum Gait Velocity (MGV) 33,34 .…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%