2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch translation of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A-D)

Abstract: The reader will be able to: (a) describe the purpose of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A) measurement tool; (b) summarize the translation process used in creating the Dutch version of the OASES-A (OASES-A-D); (c) evaluate the psychometric properties of the OASES-A-D; and (d) compare the psychometric properties of the OASES-A-D with those of the original American English OASES-A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible interpretation is that young people who continue to stutter, over time, experience an escalation in negativity regarding their communications skills. Interestingly, however, researchers did not find significant correlations between %SS and other sections of the OASES among adolescents, thereby highlighting the fact that adverse impact can exist independent from the degree of stuttering that a listener may observe (e.g., Blumgart, Tran, Yaruss, & Craig, 2012;Koedoot, Versteegh, & Yaruss, 2011;Mulcahy et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A possible interpretation is that young people who continue to stutter, over time, experience an escalation in negativity regarding their communications skills. Interestingly, however, researchers did not find significant correlations between %SS and other sections of the OASES among adolescents, thereby highlighting the fact that adverse impact can exist independent from the degree of stuttering that a listener may observe (e.g., Blumgart, Tran, Yaruss, & Craig, 2012;Koedoot, Versteegh, & Yaruss, 2011;Mulcahy et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…38,39 What we know about the experiences of young people who stutter, and why this is important in their treatment: That is, as the child gets older, adverse impact is not determined by overt speech disruptions. 38,41,42 The traditional surface severity of the young person's stuttered speech does not indicate how much they may be struggling with the impact of the disorder. The surface picture is potentially misleading-those who present as "mild" may well be suffering as much or more than those whose stuttered speech is more noticeable and visible.…”
Section: The Impact Of Stuttering On School-aged Children and Adolescmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many authors have embraced the idea that stuttering is a multidimensional disorder [59,60] and that people who stutter are a heterogeneous group. Moreover, the severity of stuttering a person exhibits may be only moderately related-or even unrelated-to the adverse psychosocial impact he or she experiences [61][62][63]. Therefore, for this study, treatment plans included multiple goals tailored to the unique needs of the individual.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%