Psychometric evaluation of the healthy aging activity engagement scale

Lu, Tingting; Kong, Linghui; Zhang, Huijun

doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.986666

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, the items were divided into two sets based on odd and even order, and the correlation between the results of both sets was calculated to evaluate the split‐half reliability of the translated questionnaire. Test–retest reliability was employed to evaluate the temporal stability of the questionnaire, with twenty nurses pre‐selected for numbering, and test–retest reliability was assessed 2 weeks later (Lu et al., 2022). Generally, it is considered acceptable when the values of Cronbach's α coefficient, split‐half reliability, and test–retest reliability are all ≥0.70 (Frost et al., 2007; Marques et al., 2021).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses

Xie,

Li,

Liu

et al. 2024

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimNurses play a crucial role within medical institutions, maintaining direct interaction with patient data. Despite this, there is a scarcity of tools for evaluating nurses' perspectives on patient information security. This study aimed to translate the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire into Chinese and validate its reliability and validity among clinical nurses.DesignA cross‐sectional design.MethodsA total of 728 clinical nurses from three hospitals in China participated in this study. The Information Security Attitude Questionnaire (ISA‐Q) was translated into Chinese utilizing the Brislin two‐way translation method. The reliability was assessed through internal consistency coefficient and test–retest reliability. The validity was determined through the Delphi expert consultation method and factor analysis.ResultsThe Chinese version of ISA‐Q consists of 30 items. Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.930, and Cronbach's α coefficient of the six dimensions ranged from 0.781 to 0.938. The split‐half reliability and test–retest reliability were 0.797 and 0.848, respectively. The content validity index (S‐CVI) was 0.962. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 6‐factor structure supported by eigenvalues, total variance interpretation, and scree plots, accounting for a cumulative variance contribution rate of 69.436%. Confirmatory factor analysis further validated the 6‐factor structure, demonstrating an appropriate model fit.ConclusionThe robust reliability and validity exhibited by the Chinese version of ISA‐Q establish it as a dependable tool for evaluating the information security attitudes of clinical nurses.Implications for Nursing PracticeThe Chinese iteration of the ISA‐Q questionnaire offers a profound insight into the information security attitudes held by clinical nurses. This understanding serves as a foundation for nursing managers to develop targeted intervention strategies aimed at fortifying nurses' information security attitudes, thereby enhancing patient safety.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses

Xie,

Li,

Liu

et al. 2024

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For this purpose, 30 nurses from the emergency department and ICU, who volunteered to participate in the study, were randomly selected and assigned numbers. After 2 weeks of completing the questionnaire, the same 30 nurses were surveyed again using identical questionnaires (Lu et al, 2022). All reliability analysis statistical procedures were conducted using SPSS 25 software.…”

Section: Reliability Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the burnout syndrome assessment scale in nurses

Xie,

Lu,

Huang

et al. 2024

Front. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study aimed to translate the Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale (BOSAS) into Chinese and validate its reliability and validity among Chinese emergency department and ICU nurses.MethodsThe scale was translated into Chinese using Brislin’s translation principle. A total of 626 nurses from Jiangxi, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces in China participated in an online questionnaire survey. The survey included the general information questionnaire for nurses developed by the research team and the Chinese version of the Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale were analyzed using SPSS.25 and AMOS.24 software.ResultsThe Chinese version of the Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale consists of a total of 20 items, encompassing two dimensions: personal burnout and job burnout. This structure is consistent with the original English version of the scale. The Chinese version of BOSAS demonstrated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.941. Additionally, the scale exhibited good split-half reliability (0.765) and test-retest reliability (0.871). The content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.971, indicating strong content validity. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the same 2-factor structure as the original scale, and confirmatory factor analysis further validated this structure, with all fit indices indicating appropriateness.ConclusionThe Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale has been successfully introduced and its reliability and validity have been verified in Chinese emergency department and ICU nurses.

show abstract

“…Based on the theory of self-determination ( Hricova et al, 2018 ; Migliorini et al, 2019 ), the scale separates intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation from aspects of autonomy, perception ability, relationships with others, and social environmental impact to understand the motivation process of people to implement health-related behaviors. Currently, the majority of health behavior assessment questionnaires are skewed toward particular topics (such as stress, physical activity, and diet) ( Schmitter-Edgecombe et al, 2017 ; Lu et al, 2022 ) and can only quantify information as to the level of health behavior participation. The Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ), despite its wide usage, confines itself to merely four health behaviors, and the limited number of items within it may impact its reliability ( Levesque et al, 2007 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the health behavior motivation scale: a translation and validation study

Ge,

Zheng,

Wang

et al. 2024

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study’s objectives were to translate the Health Behavior Motivation Scale (HBMS) into Chinese and verify the scale’s validity and reliability among Chinese healthy adults.MethodThe HBMS scales were translated into Chinese based on Brislin’s principles. The Chinese version of HBMS is created through translation, back translation, and cross-cultural adaptation. This investigation implemented the convenience sampling method to conduct a survey on 781 healthy respondents, utilizing the Chinese version of the HBMS and a general demographic questionnaire. We used AMOS (v28.0) and SPSS (v26.0) for statistical analysis. We employed test–retest reliability, split-half reliability, and internal consistency to assess the reliability of the translation questionnaire. Structure validity and content validity were used to assess validity.ResultsThe Chinese version of the Health Behavior Motivation Scale (HBMS) had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.885, and the range of Cronbach’s alpha values for each dimension was 0.820–0.885. The scale’s test–retest reliability was 0.824, and its split-half reliability was 0.906. Five public factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 56.527% were retrieved from the exploratory factor analysis. Moreover, the factor loading value for each item exceeded 0.4.In confirmatory factor analysis, the indicators were reported as follows: χ2/df = 1.567, GFI = 0.900, CFI = 0.952, IFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.946, AGFI = 0.881, PGFI = 0.757, PNFI = 0.789, RMSEA = 0.039, and the results of the model fit metrics were within the reference range.ConclusionThe Chinese version of the HBMS exhibits strong discrimination, validity, and reliability. The tool effectively identifies the motivation of healthy people to engage in healthy behaviors. It can be used by healthcare practitioners to assist in the development of follow-up interventions to reduce the prevalence of chronic disease in older people and the incidence of chronic disease in populations of young and middle-aged people.

show abstract

Psychometric evaluation of the healthy aging activity engagement scale

Cited by 7 publications

References 28 publications

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the burnout syndrome assessment scale in nurses

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the health behavior motivation scale: a translation and validation study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About