2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric evaluation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in primary school students with mild intellectual disability: First evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 The Greek translation is both reliable and valid. 23 In this study, the RSES Cronbach alpha coefficient was α = 0.80.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…22 The Greek translation is both reliable and valid. 23 In this study, the RSES Cronbach alpha coefficient was α = 0.80.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The results suggest that parental trust and support for their younger children positively affect their self-esteem, which further affects their college learning engagement. Drawing from other studies, 62,63 it is supported that trust, support, and attachment with parents stimulate self-esteem during childhood and adolescence. Parental trust and support are one of the constructs incorporated into parenting, specifically the attachment level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Researchers claim this scale is a two-dimensional construct of positive and negative self-images when using the CFA. Besides, five items with positive words on one factor were named “positive self-esteem” (PSE), and five items with negative words on another factor were termed “negative self-esteem” (NSE) [ 35 , 36 ]. Previous studies have reported a poor fit for the single-factor model of this scale using the CFA, as well as a better fit with positive and negative self-images for the two-factor model [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%