1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1980.tb00831.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Implications of the Unit‐of‐analysis Problem (With Examples From the Measurement of Organizational Climate)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
72
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This perspective is consistent with authentic leadership theory because the latter highlights the importance of leaders being able to openly share information and build trusting relationships with all followers in their work group, department, or the overall organization (Avolio et al, 2004;Gardner et al, 2005;Ilies et al, 2005). As suggested by Sirotnik (1980), we computed the internal consistency reliability estimate for authentic leadership at the group level. This estimate was 0.88.…”
Section: Level Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This perspective is consistent with authentic leadership theory because the latter highlights the importance of leaders being able to openly share information and build trusting relationships with all followers in their work group, department, or the overall organization (Avolio et al, 2004;Gardner et al, 2005;Ilies et al, 2005). As suggested by Sirotnik (1980), we computed the internal consistency reliability estimate for authentic leadership at the group level. This estimate was 0.88.…”
Section: Level Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…That is, if a structural variable describes an aggregate-level phenomenon, then representation of the phenomenon using a nonaggregated variable (e.g., individual perceptions) may be inappropriate, and an aggregated variable may be called for. Adapted to studies on legislative structure, if a structural variable reflects a local-level decision process, then individual-level perceptions of the process by officers or by members may introduce ecological bias (Sirotnik, 1980). That is, individual-level perceptions may be idiosyncratic rather than representative of the aggregate-level process.…”
Section: Administrative and Legislative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 1 describes the sample in more detail. Because analyses used the class mean as the unit of analysis, validation data for both the individual and class mean as units of analysis are reported below as recommended by Sirotnik (1980).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%