2016
DOI: 10.1002/gps.4441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties and feasibility of instruments for the detection of delirium in older hospitalized patients: a systematic review

Abstract: Timely detection of delirium might reduce the negative outcomes of delirium in the long term. The Nu-DESC and CAM appear to be the most adequate instruments for detecting delirium. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
89
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method, short version (s-CAM), which details the following delirium features: (1) acute onset, (2) inattention, (3) disorganised thinking, (4) altered level of consciousness [25]. The s-CAM has high sensitivity of >94% and specificity >90% for the detection of delirium and accurately distinguishes between delirium and dementia [26]. FSD was defined as persons demonstrating abnormalities in features 1 + 2 + (3 or 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method, short version (s-CAM), which details the following delirium features: (1) acute onset, (2) inattention, (3) disorganised thinking, (4) altered level of consciousness [25]. The s-CAM has high sensitivity of >94% and specificity >90% for the detection of delirium and accurately distinguishes between delirium and dementia [26]. FSD was defined as persons demonstrating abnormalities in features 1 + 2 + (3 or 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It performed well in patients with mild cognitive impairment or in the ICU settings without endotracheal intubation. More than 28 kinds of assessment instruments are constructed and introduced to facilitate delirium screening [17,25]. These instruments significantly improved the efficacy and accuracy of delirium diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instruments significantly improved the efficacy and accuracy of delirium diagnosis. Of these, the CAM was proposed to be the most efficient one [17,25]. However, one deficit of the CAM is that there exists discrepancy in diagnostic criteria between interviewers even after substantial training [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review on instruments for delirium detection showed that the Delirium Observation Screening Scale is a validated tool used by nurses with good predictive validity against the DSM-IV diagnosis of delirium made by a geriatrician, with high sensitivity and specificity for delirium, and easy to apply in daily clinical practice at the bedside. [30] The scale has been translated in English and Dutch. [31] Information about delirium symptoms from medical and nursing records considering the previous 24 hours was taken into account as well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%