2006
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties and the prevalence, intensity and causes of oral impacts on daily performance (OIDP) in a population of older Tanzanians

Abstract: Background: The objective was to study whether a Kiswahili version of the OIDP (Oral Impacts on Daily Performance) inventory was valid and reliable for use in a population of older adults in urban and rural areas of Tanzania; and to assess the area specific prevalence, intensity and perceived causes of OIDP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

25
71
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(41 reference statements)
25
71
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the prevalence of oral impacts on daily performances was calculated as the percentage of children with a CS-Child-OIDP score higher than zero. Furthermore, among those children reporting oral impacts, the intensity of the impact on each performance score (ranging from 1 to 9) was classified into 5 levels: very little (1), little (2), moderate (3–4), severe (6) and very severe (9) [17,18]. The overall intensity of impacts was then estimated as the most severe impact on any of the 8 performances [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the prevalence of oral impacts on daily performances was calculated as the percentage of children with a CS-Child-OIDP score higher than zero. Furthermore, among those children reporting oral impacts, the intensity of the impact on each performance score (ranging from 1 to 9) was classified into 5 levels: very little (1), little (2), moderate (3–4), severe (6) and very severe (9) [17,18]. The overall intensity of impacts was then estimated as the most severe impact on any of the 8 performances [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall intensity of impacts was then estimated as the most severe impact on any of the 8 performances [17]. Finally, the extent of impacts, ranging from 1 to 8 performances, was calculated as the number of performances with impacts [17,18]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first stage, 10 pure urban villages (n = 6,290) and 10 pure rural villages (n = 3,729) were selected by systematic random sampling from the district village population lists. In the second stage, a total of 60 households were selected by systematic random sampling from each village selected in the first stage [for a more detailed description of the sampling procedure, see [12,13]]. The study was approved by the Research and Publication Committee at Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences, regional and district administration authorities, village leaders and by the ethical research committee in Norway (REK VEST).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional disadvantage was measured broadly using the eight item Oral Impact on Daily Performance, OIDP, inventory (e.g. During the previous 6 months – how often have problems with your teeth and mouth caused you any difficulty with eating, speaking, cleaning teeth, smiling, sleeping, emotional balance, work and social contact) [13]. General oral health perceptions were assessed by two items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation