Psychometric Properties of Creative Self-Efficacy Inventory Among Distinguished Students in Saudi Arabian Universities

Alotaibi, Khaled

doi:10.1177/0033294116646021

Cited by 8 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It acts as a motivation. It is a dynamic psychological resource and a component of the theory of behavioral change [63]. This means that the SL and WE relationship is high when self-efficacy is high in the employee for a certain work outcome.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Servant Leadership: Impact on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Knowledge Sharing Behavior

Shafi¹,

Rabbani²,

Alam³

et al. 2020

Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to investigate the effect of servant leadership on organizational citizenship behavior and knowledge-sharing behavior. It further explores servant leadership for its potential mediation of work engagement and moderation of self-efficacy in organizational citizenship behavior and knowledge-sharing behavior. Time-lagged data was collected from 264 respondents from Pakistan’s banking sector via convenience sampling. The relationships between servant leadership and organizational citizenship behavior, servant leadership and knowledge-sharing behavior were analyzed through partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results of this analysis reveals that the effect of servant leadership on organizational citizenship behavior and knowledge-sharing behavior is significant in that work engagement acts as a mediator, and follower’s self-efficacy plays the role of moderator. Based upon social exchange theory, the study supports that servant leadership increases citizenship and knowledge-sharing behavior. In addition, the study provides an understanding of how servant leadership mediates work engagement for pragmatic synergetic outcomes in a Pakistani context. The study’s implications and limitations are also discussed, and suggestions for future research are noted.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Servant Leadership: Impact on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Knowledge Sharing Behavior

Shafi¹,

Rabbani²,

Alam³

et al. 2020

Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Only quantitative methods were used in 81 of the studies (92%). Three of the studies that included quantitative methods included scale adaptation studies (Alotaibi, 2016;Hung, 2018; Atabek, 2020). In articles using quantitative methods, questionnaires (paper and pen survey, questionnaire, survey) were mostly used (e.g., Beghetto, 2006;Woodcock et al, 2019).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Katz-Buonincontro et al (2021) adapted the scale measuring CSE from the items developed by Beghetto (2006), and Tierney and Farmer (2002) and translated it into Mandarin. Alotaibi (2016) examined the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the CSE inventory which is developed by Abbott (2010). Hung (2018) explored the dimensionality of the CSE Student Scale (unidimensional and multidimensional rating scale models) which is developed by Hung and Lin (2005) and revised as a 12item version (Hung, 2009;as cited in Hung, 2018) that includes the three components of the CSE with a Taiwanese sample.…”

Section: Research Issues/themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Creative Self-Efficacy Literature in Education

Ünal

Taşar

2021

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article we reviewed literature related to creative self-efficacy in the field of education. We narrowed down the review to eighty-eight articles. We formed categories according to (1) publication year, (2) country of study, (3) sample/study group, (4) method used, and ( 5) subject matter addressed. The first study was published in 2004. The frequency of publications increased in the last three years. USA, China, and Taiwan are the leading countries in terms of origin of published articles. Except four inter-cultural studies, all others were conducted in a single country. About half of the studies were conducted with K-12 students and teachers, and the remaining focused on higher education students and instructors. Mostly quantitative methods have been utilized. Lastly, we categorized the issues tackled into nine themes. Researchers gave a heavy emphasis on investigating creativity/creativity indicators, individual/environmental factors and less emphasis on academic performance in relation to creative self-efficacy.

show abstract

“…Creativity research has also emphasized the multidimensionality of CSE (Abbott, 2010;Alotaibi, 2016;Beghetto, 2009;Karwowski et al, 2012). In the CSE literature, two dimensions have consistently arised: one related to a cognitive aspect (Tan, 2007), and another related to performance (Farmer & Tierney, 2017;Mathisen, 2011).…”

Section: Creative Self-efficacy As a Multidimensional Constructmentioning

confidence: 99%

Creative Self-Efficacy Scale for Children and Adolescents (CASES): A Development and Validation Study

Valquaresma

Coimbra

Costa

2022

Int. j. psychol. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Creative self-efficacy has emerged as one of the most striking constructs in education. Yet, instruments to assess it in children and adolescentsare scant. This article introduces the CASES, a new creative self-efficacy scale designed to address this concern. The process of development and initial validation of the scale are presented herein. Following the items’ conception, exploratory, and confirmatory factorial analysis was performed. The final structure comprises nine items, evenly distributed by three factors: fluency, elaboration, and personality. Preliminary reliability and validity analysis display good psychometric properties, highlighting CASES as a potentially relevant addition to the creative self-efficacy assessment instruments array. Designed for children and adolescents (ages 3 to 16), it can uphold a developmental approach of creative self-efficacy, with potential implications within educational settings. Thus, it might be of interest for parents, educators, educational psychologists, researchers, and policymakers involved in designing curricula and interventions to nurture and enhance creative potential.

show abstract

Psychometric Properties of Creative Self-Efficacy Inventory Among Distinguished Students in Saudi Arabian Universities

Cited by 8 publications

References 45 publications

Servant Leadership: Impact on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Knowledge Sharing Behavior

Servant Leadership: Impact on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Knowledge Sharing Behavior

A Systematic Review of Creative Self-Efficacy Literature in Education

Creative Self-Efficacy Scale for Children and Adolescents (CASES): A Development and Validation Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About