2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of measurements obtained with the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale in an Icelandic probability based Internet sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure was used as a covariate to be controlled for, such that any relationship identified between the variables and the outcome would not be accountable for by response bias. Reliability coefficients ranged from .59 to .75 (Vésteinsdóttir, Reips, Joinson, & Thorsdottir, 2015). In this sample, the internal consistency was .74, which indicated good reliability.…”
Section: Social Desirabilitymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This measure was used as a covariate to be controlled for, such that any relationship identified between the variables and the outcome would not be accountable for by response bias. Reliability coefficients ranged from .59 to .75 (Vésteinsdóttir, Reips, Joinson, & Thorsdottir, 2015). In this sample, the internal consistency was .74, which indicated good reliability.…”
Section: Social Desirabilitymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This study also uses survey manipulation in an attempt to reduce socially desirable responses that could potentially be in effect for online surveys (Krumpal, 2013). Though the original MCSDS was normed based on paper and pencil responses, research supports that the online version of the MCSDS is psychometrically sound and a reliable measure of social desirability (Vésteinsdóttir et al, 2015). It is important to incorporate social desirability to account for self-reports, especially of open-mindedness, to account for the discrepancy between true open-mindedness and self-reported open-mindedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies that did test for this bias usually used a shortened Marlowe-Crowne or Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding SDB Scale (and the quality of shortened scales varies; see Beretvas, Meyers, & Leite, 2002; Fischer & Fick, 1993; Vesteinsdottir, Reips, Joinson, & Thorsdottir, 2015). Some researchers reviewed each respondent’s SDB Scale score and dropped subjects with “high” bias scores (e.g., Goetzke, Nitzko, & Spiller, 2014; Hartig, Kaiser, & Bowler, 2001; Soyez, 2012).…”
Section: Sdb and Green Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%