Psychometric properties of the Brief Pain Inventory among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement surgery

Kapstad, Heidi; Rokne, Berit; Stavem, Knut

doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-148

Cited by 75 publications

(71 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The BPI-SF assesses presence of pain, intensity of pain, current treatments being used, perceived pain relief from treatments, and extent that pain interferes with daily living (Kapstad, Rokne, & Stavem, 2010; Mendoza, Mayne, Rublee, & Cleeland, 2006). The 15-item BPI-SF was developed for cancer pain patients, but has shown consistent validity and reliability for many conditions (Kumar, 2011).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Characteristics of Pain in Patients Diagnosed with Depression and Heart Failure

Haedtke

Smith

VanBuren

et al. 2017

Pain Management Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Heart failure (HF) is a costly and growing health problem that is routinely complicated by chronic pain and depression. The purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of pain and pain management in depressed HF patients. Design/Participants In this descriptive cross-sectional study, we analyzed data from 62 participants with depression and Class II–IV HF. Study variables of interest were collected from the Brief Pain Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and Rand-36. Results Almost all participants (98%) had some pain in the past month and most had pain in the last 24 hours (66%). The median pain score was 4 (0–10 scale) with the majority reporting moderate to severe pain. The median pain interference score was 4.42 (0–10 scale) with the majority reporting moderate to extreme interference. Medication to treat pain was used by all participants who reported pain with only 5% also using non-pharmacologic treatment. Conclusion The majority of participants reported moderate or severe pain while also having moderate to extreme pain interference. Non- pharmacologic pain treatments were severely underutilized. Women were more likely to have higher levels of pain intensity and more pain interference than men suggesting that, additional screening for the impact of pain is especially important in women. The wide variety of body areas affected along with moderate to high intensity pain and considerable interference scores reported, indicate that pain was ineffectively treated. Non-pharmacologic treatments should be considered to decrease the impact of pain.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Characteristics of Pain in Patients Diagnosed with Depression and Heart Failure

Haedtke

Smith

VanBuren

et al. 2017

Pain Management Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En este estudio, los valores de KMO son buenos y revelan que el modelo se adapta a los datos (37). Se confirmaron los dos factores (severidad e interferencia del dolor), obtenidos en otras culturas (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)15,16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) excepto en las muestras provenientes de Noruega (14) y de Estados Unidos (17), que revelaron una estructura factorial con tres dimensiones (factor 1: interferencia en la actividad diaria; factor 2: interferencia en el humor; factor 3: severidad del dolor). La varianza explicada de los factores presenta un valor superior al 50 % (37,38), semejante a la muestra española (12), lo que difiere de los valores de las muestras de Italia (51 %) (13) y de Rusia (80 %) (20).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…La versión corta del BPI se adaptó para varios países, por ejemplo, Portugal (6,7), Alemania (8), Tailandia (9,10), Grecia (11), España (12), Italia (13), Noruega (14,15), Estados Unidos (16,17), Corea (18), Canadá (19), Rusia (20), Líbano (21) y Brasil (22). La escala se adaptó con mayor frecuencia para su uso en personas con dolor de origen oncológico (9)(10)(11)(12)14,17,18,(20)(21)(22) y, posteriormente, en personas con las siguientes patologías: dolor crónico no maligno (13,16), dolor crónico músculo-esquelético (6,7), osteoartritis (15), estrés postraumático (19) y sida (17).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…La escala se adaptó con mayor frecuencia para su uso en personas con dolor de origen oncológico (9)(10)(11)(12)14,17,18,(20)(21)(22) y, posteriormente, en personas con las siguientes patologías: dolor crónico no maligno (13,16), dolor crónico músculo-esquelético (6,7), osteoartritis (15), estrés postraumático (19) y sida (17). El tamaño de las muestras utilizadas en los diferentes estudios varió entre 75 (21) y 520 (10) personas con dolor.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validación del Brief Pain Inventory en personas con enfermedad renal crónica

Sousa¹,

Marques-Vieira²,

Severino³

et al. 2017

Aquichan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENObjetivo: comprobar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión portuguesa del Brief Pain Inventory, en personas con enfermedad renal crónica sometidas a hemodiálisis. Método: estudio metodológico. La muestra seleccionada está compuesta por 171 personas con enfermedad renal crónica que presentan dolor durante al menos 24 horas y realizan hemodiálisis en dos clínicas de la región de Lisboa, Portugal. Los datos se recogieron entre mayo y junio del 2015. Se evaluaron las siguientes propiedades psicométricas: validez (constructo, convergente y discriminante), confiabilidad (α de Cronbach) y estabilidad (test-retest). Resultados: se obtuvo información que apoya adecuadamente una estructura bifactorial (interferencia del dolor y grado de severidad del dolor), con confiabilidad (α = 0,90 y α = 0,80, respectivamente) y estabilidad. Las medidas registradas están correlacionadas de forma positiva con el afecto negativo, y de forma negativa, con las medidas de calidad de vida, que sustentan la validez concurrente. Se comprobó la existencia de apoyo para la validez predictiva. Conclusiones: las medidas del "grado de severidad del dolor" e "interferencia del dolor" que se obtuvieron a través del Brief Pain Inventory son válidas y reproducibles en personas con enfermedad renal crónica que presentaron dolor en las últimas 24 horas, cuando se utiliza el cuestionario y la entrevista. PALABRAS CLAVEInsuficiencia renal crónica; diálisis renal; dimensión del dolor; estudios de validación; psicometría (Fuente: DeCS, BIREME). Method: This is a methodological study. The selected sample is comprised of 171 persons with chronic kidney disease who experience pain for at least 24 hours and are undergoing hemodialysis at two clinics in Lisbon, Portugal. The data were collected between May and June 2015. The psychometric properties that were evaluated include validity (construct, convergent and discriminant), reliability (Cronbach's α) and stability (test-retest). Results: Information was obtained that adequately supports a bi-factor structure (pain interference and degree of pain severity), with reliability (α = 0.90 and α = 0.80, respectively) and stability. The measures registered correlate positively with the negative effect, and negatively, with measures of quality of life, which support concurrent validity. The existence of support for predictive validity was verified. Conclusions: The "pain severity" and "pain interference" measures obtained with the Brief Pain Inventory are valid and reproducible in persons with chronic kidney disease who experienced pain during the 24 hours before the questionnaire was used and the interview was conducted.

show abstract

“…The BPI-SF assesses intensity of pain, and extent that pain interferes with social and physical function. 15 Scores for the 4 intensity items and 7 interference items are averaged to derive a single score value each for pain intensity and pain interference. The 15-item BPI-SF has shown consistent validity and reliability for many conditions.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationships Among Pain, Depression, and Physical Activity in Patients With Heart Failure

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Increasing patients’ physical activity levels holds many opportunities to facilitate health and well-being among those with heart failure (HF) by improving HF symptoms and decreasing depression and pain. Given low exercise participation rates, an essential first step to increase exercise rates is to evaluate how pain and depression may further influence engagement in exercise programs. Aims: To describe the level of physical activity and exercise that HF patients with depression achieve and to investigate the relationships among pain, depression, total activity time and sitting time. Methods In this correlational cross-sectional study we analyzed data from 61 participants with depression and Class II-IV HF. Results and Conclusion The total time spent being active was less than 1 hour per day. Depressed HF patients have much lower physical activity levels than the general public. Decreasing sitting time and increasing light activity levels hold promise to improve pain and depression symptoms.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Brief Pain Inventory among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement surgery

Cited by 75 publications

References 34 publications

The Characteristics of Pain in Patients Diagnosed with Depression and Heart Failure

The Characteristics of Pain in Patients Diagnosed with Depression and Heart Failure

Validación del Brief Pain Inventory en personas con enfermedad renal crónica

The Relationships Among Pain, Depression, and Physical Activity in Patients With Heart Failure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About