Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Spiritual Index of Well-Being in elderly Taiwanese

Wu, Lijie; Yang, Shuhui; Koo, Malcolm

doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0392-1

Cited by 21 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The result of the confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the internal structure of the SIWB-F is valid and has a good model fit. This is consistent with the original English version (Frey et al, 2005), the English version among community-dwelling elderly individuals (Daaleman et al, 2002), and the English version among individuals with psychiatric disabilities (Fukui et al, 2012), and Chinese version (Wu et al, 2017) of the SIWB. In addition, the same items were loaded on the two factors, that is items 1 to 6 in factor 1 and items 7 to 12 in factor 2.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…For the internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's α coefficient, itemtotal correlation, and inter-item correlation were computed. The Cronbach's α coefficient for 12 items was 0.903, which is similar to the original English version of the tool with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.91 (Frey et al, 2005), the English version among communitydwelling elderly individuals (α=0.87) (Daaleman et al, 2002), the English version among individuals with psychiatric disabilities (α=0.88) (Fukui et al, 2012) and the Chinese version with α coefficient of 0.94 (Wu et al, 2017). On the other hand, the α coefficient for selfefficacy scheme and life scheme was 0.864 and 0.889, which is consistent with the original English version (self-efficacy scheme, α=0.89 and life scheme, α=0.86), the English version among community-dwelling elderly individuals (self-efficacy scheme, α=0.83 and life scheme, α=0.80) (Daaleman et al, 2002), the English version among individuals with psychiatric disabilities (self-efficacy scheme, α=0.92 and life scheme, α=0.91) (Fukui et al, 2012) and Chinese version (self-efficacy scheme, α=0.86 and life scheme, α=0.93).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 52%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric Properties of Spiritual Index of Well-Being Among Filipino Women With Breast Cancer

Soriano¹

2020

Belitung Nurs J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Breast cancer patients need to be treated not only physically and emotionally but also spiritually. Hence, the assessment of the spirituality of patients is essential to provide holistic nursing care. However, there was no culturally valid and reliable instrument that measures spirituality among Filipino women with breast cancer.Objective: The study was conducted to determine the psychometric properties of the spiritual index of well-being among Filipino women with breast cancer.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized in the study, and a sample of 170 Filipino women with breast cancer were included. The World Health Organization guidelines were used to translate the original instrument to Filipino, and content validity was computed using the Davis technique. Also, confirmatory factor analysis with maximum likelihood estimation was performed to assess the construct validity of the instrument. Cronbach’s α and item-total correlations were done to assess the internal consistency of the Filipino version of the spiritual index of well-being.Results: The Filipino version of the spiritual index of well-being had an item content validity index (I-CVI) ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 and a scale content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.95. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed factor loadings of 0.42 to 0.72. Also, the CFA model revealed a 𝜒2/df = 2.51, root mean square error of approximation= 0.074, comparative fit index= 0.091, goodness of fit index=0.98, Tucker-Lewis index= 0.93, incremental fit index= 0.91, and standard root mean square residual== 0.072.Conclusion: The Filipino version of the spiritual index of well-being was cross-culturally valid and reliable in measuring the spiritual index of well-being among Filipino women with breast cancer.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 52%

Psychometric Properties of Spiritual Index of Well-Being Among Filipino Women With Breast Cancer

Soriano¹

2020

Belitung Nurs J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An estimated internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha and item-factor correlation) was assessed in the current study, which meant the degree as to which a score or sub-score of a questionnaire reflected a narrow/ closely-confined or rather broad/widely-ranged construct[ 50 , 51 ]. Besides, a stability test was conducted based on the Guttman split-half coefficient, which was also important to determine psychometric quality and test reliability[ 52 ]. What’s more, Multi-Trait-Multi-Method (MTMM) was conducted to assess the construct validity of the ASI-3 against the DASS-21 and TAI.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability, validation and norms of the Chinese version of Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 in a sample of military personnel

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to explore the properties of the Chinese version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index– 3 (ASI-3) in a sample of military personnel. Using non-probabilistic sampling, the Chinese version of the ASI-3 was administered to 3,077 valid participants aged 16 to 36 years old (M = 22.35, SD = 3.57) from nine military units. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) and The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were used to assess the construct validity. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare the differences in the services and positions of the participants. It was found that ①The indices of confirmatory factor analysis met the standard values, which supported the hypothesis of the three-factor model of the original ASI-3; ②ASI-3 was significantly associated with DASS-21 in positive ways, which indicated the high convergent validity; on the other hand, the correlation between ASI-3 and TAI was relatively low, which indicated there was an empirical discrimination between anxiety sensitivity and trait anxiety. ③The Cronbach’s α coefficients were 0.926 for the total scale and 0.828–0.841 for the three subscales; ④At a cut-off score of 16, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.1% and 76.7%, respectively, where the sum of sensitivity and specificity becomes the maximum, accompanied with improvement of PPV and NPV; ⑤There were significant findings in the ASI and subscales among the five services and four positions. This study provides new evidence that the Chinese version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 has good validity and reliability and could be applied as an effective tool to assess anxiety sensitivity in military personnel. Our recommendations to researchers and practitioners are that the three factor model should be replicated across some different special forces and the items and constructs could be modified on Chinese culture.

show abstract

“…The SIWB shows associations in health and well-being constructs across primary care and geriatric outpatient settings (Daaleman et al 2002) and has recently been translated into Chinese (Wu et al 2017).…”

Section: Self-reporting Measures (Spiritual and Religious Well-being)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Spirituality and Religiosity in Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review of Available Instruments

Austin¹,

Macdonald²,

MacLeod

2018

Religions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: Numerous measures exist that assess dimensions of spirituality and religiosity in health, theological and social settings. In this review, we aim to identify and evaluate measures assessing factors relating to spirituality and religiosity in clinical settings. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases with search terms relating to spirituality, religiosity that also included well-being, needs, distress and beliefs used in self-reporting and clinician-administered measures. Only articles relating to the validation and subsequent administration of measures used in clinical settings were eligible for review. Results: Of 75 measures selected for initial screening, 25 had been validated and used in clinical settings and were reviewed for this study. Most measures were validated in oncological and palliative care settings where the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-Sp12) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Spiritual, Religious and Personal Beliefs (WHOQOL-SRPB) were most validated and frequently used. Only six measures were found that assessed spiritual distress and/or the needs of which only two had been investigated more than twice. Two measures assessing spirituality and religious beliefs in healthcare staff were also reviewed. Conclusions: This review provides a current summary of measures evaluating several dimensions of spirituality and religiosity used in clinical settings. Currently there is a lack of reliable measures evaluating spiritual needs and distress.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Spiritual Index of Well-Being in elderly Taiwanese

Cited by 21 publications

References 15 publications

Psychometric Properties of Spiritual Index of Well-Being Among Filipino Women With Breast Cancer

Psychometric Properties of Spiritual Index of Well-Being Among Filipino Women With Breast Cancer

Reliability, validation and norms of the Chinese version of Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 in a sample of military personnel

Measuring Spirituality and Religiosity in Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review of Available Instruments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About