2009
DOI: 10.1002/eat.20653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the clinical impairment assessment: Norms for young adult women

Abstract: Results demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties of the CIA among a sample of young adult women, suggesting the utility of the CIA to measure impairment due to eating disorder features in nonclinical samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present sample, all ED groups had very elevated CIA scores compared to previously reported population norms: Young adult women in Sweden: M = 8.3, SD = 9.4 [28], adolescent Fijian girls: M = 11.6, SD = 10.9) [36], young adult female Norwegian University students; M = 6.4, SD = 7.5 [37]. There were no differences in CIA scores between diagnostic groups (AN, BN, EDNOS).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present sample, all ED groups had very elevated CIA scores compared to previously reported population norms: Young adult women in Sweden: M = 8.3, SD = 9.4 [28], adolescent Fijian girls: M = 11.6, SD = 10.9) [36], young adult female Norwegian University students; M = 6.4, SD = 7.5 [37]. There were no differences in CIA scores between diagnostic groups (AN, BN, EDNOS).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Across ED diagnoses, CIA scores were very high compared to reported population norms [28,36,37], which suggests that individuals with EDs are severely impaired by their disorder and are very aware of the impairment they experience as a result of their ED. A focus on functional impairment in treatment may therefore help to increase motivation and readiness to change by highlighting the benefits of making changes to current eating behaviours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The Clinical Impairment Assessment 3.0 (CIA) is a 16-item, self-report questionnaire that measures psychosocial impairment in the past 28 days across multiple domains (mood and self-perception; cognitive functioning; interpersonal functioning and work performance) due to ED features (Bohn et al, 2008). The CIA has demonstrated high levels of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, construct validity, and discriminant validity (Becker et al, 2010; Bohn et al, 2008; Reas, Rø, Kapstad, & Lask, 2010). The Diet Aids Checklist (DACL) is a comprehensive list of 53 diet aids currently available to the public, which assesses lifetime endorsement of each diet aid and frequency of use over the past six months.…”
Section: 2 Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cronbach’s alpha for the present sample was 0.92. The CIA has shown good psychometric properties in clinical [36,37], high risk [38] and community samples [39]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%