Psychometric properties of the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) in seven countries

Yang, Sophie Xin; Jowett, Sophia

doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.010

Cited by 52 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The items were assigned a score ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 7 (“strongly agree”) with a mid‐point of 4 (“half‐way”). The psychometric property of the CART‐Q within Chinese sports population has been evidenced in previous empirical studies (e.g., Yang & Jowett, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 63%

“…This system, therefore, together with the traditional oriental culture has brought a unique feature to the nature of the Chinese coach–athlete relationship. For instance, previous research highlighted that the idea of being respectful to the coach is more likely to be viewed as a moral goodness in all kinds of teacher–student relationships including coach–athlete relationship in China (Yang & Jowett, ). However, respect in the context of British coach–athlete relationship is often seen as an interpersonal quality or relational property that needs to be developed over a certain period of time.…”

Section: The Sporting Culture In Chinamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of big‐five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach–athlete dyads

Yang

Jowett

Chan

2014

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study examined the influence of personality traits on the quality of the Chinese coach-athlete relationship and satisfaction through a dyadic research design. A total of 350 coach-athlete dyads completed a self-report instrument that assessed personality traits, as well as perceptions of relationship quality and satisfaction with training. Results revealed that: (a) actor effects (i.e., actor's personality will predict his or her own perceptions of relationship quality) of personality traits, namely, conscientiousness, extroversion, and neuroticism, on both coaches' and athletes' perceptions of relationship quality and (b) partner effects (an actor's own personality will predict his or her partner's perceptions of relationship quality) of only athletes' personality, namely, conscientiousness, extroversion, and neuroticism, on their coaches' perceptions of relationship quality. The findings suggested that each relationship member's personality trait contributed independently to relationship quality, and both actor and partner effects of the relationship quality on satisfaction with training were found to be significant. In Chinese sports culture, there presents a unique dynamics of personality and relationship quality among coach-athlete dyad.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 63%

Section: The Sporting Culture In Chinamentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of big‐five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach–athlete dyads

Yang

Jowett

Chan

2014

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The translated version of the 11-item CART-Q (Yang & Jowett, 2012) and the 13-item GrCART-Q (Jowett & Ntoumanis, 2003) were adapted. However, no Chinese version was available for the 29-item LvCART-Q and the IS.…”

Section: Translation Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Psychometric Properties of the Short and Long Versions of the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire

Yang

Jowett

2013

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire was developed to effectively measure affective, cognitive, and behavioral aspects, represented by the interpersonal constructs of closeness, commitment, and complementarity, of the quality of the relationship within the context of sport coaching. The current study sought to determine the internal reliability and factorial validity of the long (the 29-item Long Version Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire) and short (11-item Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire and 13-item Greek Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire) versions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire with a sample of 800 Chinese coaches and athletes. Results supported the internal reliability across all Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire versions examined, while confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) only supported the factorial validity of the three-factor first-order model of the 11-item Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for theory, research, and practice.

show abstract

“…Such an examination will also enable an assessment of whether the OSI‐SP, and the conceptualization and operationalization on which it is based, are capable of accommodating the idiosyncrasies of cultural diversity (cf. Sue, ; Yang & Jowett, ). The conceptualization on which the OSI‐SP is based is Fletcher et al.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such an examination will also enable an assessment of whether the OSI-SP, and the conceptualization and operationalization on which it is based, are capable of accommodating the idiosyncrasies of cultural diversity (cf. Sue, 1999;Yang & Jowett, 2012). The conceptualization on which the OSI-SP is based is Fletcher et al's (2006) meta-model of stress, emotions, and performance which stipulates that stressors arise from the environment an individual is operating in (objective stressors) and are subsequently perceived by individuals (subjective stressors).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross‐cultural validity and measurement invariance of the Organizational Stressor Indicator for Sport Performers (OSI‐SP) across three countries

Arnold

Ponnusamy²,

Zhang

et al. 2016

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organizational stressors are a universal phenomenon which can be particularly prevalent and problematic for sport performers. In view of their global existence, it is surprising that no studies have examined cross-cultural differences in organizational stressors. One explanation for this is that the Organizational Stressor Indicator for Sport Performers (OSI-SP; Arnold, Fletcher, & Daniels, 2013), which can comprehensively measure the organizational pressures that sport performers have encountered, has not yet been translated from English into any other languages nor scrutinized cross-culturally. The first purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the cross-cultural validity of the OSI-SP. In addition, the study aimed to test the equivalence of the OSI-SP's factor structure across cultures. British (n = 379), Chinese (n = 335), and Malaysian (n = 444) sport performers completed the OSI-SP. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the cross-cultural validity of the factorial model for the British and Malaysian samples; however, the overall model fit for the Chinese data did not meet all guideline values. Support was provided for the equality of factor loadings, variances, and covariances on the OSI-SP across the British and Malaysian cultures. These findings advance knowledge and understanding on the cross-cultural existence, conceptualization, and operationalization of organizational stressors.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) in seven countries

Cited by 52 publications

References 32 publications

Effects of big‐five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach–athlete dyads

Effects of big‐five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach–athlete dyads

The Psychometric Properties of the Short and Long Versions of the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire

Cross‐cultural validity and measurement invariance of the Organizational Stressor Indicator for Sport Performers (OSI‐SP) across three countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About