Psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) in patients with acquired brain injury.

Brands, Ingrid; Köhler, Sebastian; Stapert, Sven; Wade, Derick T; Heugten, Caroline van

doi:10.1037/a0036275

Cited by 31 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Psychometric properties of the CISS for use in patients with ABI have been shown to be good. 21 Because confirmatory factor analysis showed a 3-factor structure (T, E, A), 21 we did not use the avoidance subscales.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Self-Efficacy and Coping on Quality of Life and Social Participation After Acquired Brain Injury: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study

Brands¹,

Köhler²,

Stapert³

et al. 2014

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Self-Efficacy and Coping on Quality of Life and Social Participation After Acquired Brain Injury: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study

Brands¹,

Köhler²,

Stapert³

et al. 2014

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Endler and Parker7,8 presented an exceedingly simple way of conceptualizing coping strategies by dividing them into task-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping, and avoidance-oriented coping, which they in turn used to establish the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS). This scale comprises 48 items and has, since its development, become one of the most extensively used tools with good psychometric properties 9–11. Task-oriented coping refers to the use of problem-solving and information seeking to change stressful situations; emotion-oriented coping is defined as attempts to reduce stress through emotional reactions (eg, self-blame, depression, and anger) or rumination; and avoidance-oriented coping refers to the use of distraction, diversion, and withdraw behaviors to avoid stress.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adapting the short form of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations into Chinese

Li¹,

Liu²,

Hu³

et al. 2017

NDT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) is a measurement tool for evaluating stress that has good psychometric properties. We investigated the applicability of a short-form version of the CISS in a large sample of Chinese university students.MethodsNine hundred and seventy-two Chinese university students aged 18–30 years (mean =20.15, standard deviation =3.26) were chosen as subjects, of whom 101 were randomly selected to be retested after a 2-week interval.ResultsThe results of a confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the root mean square error of approximation of a four-factor model was 0.06, while the comparative fit index was 0.91, the incremental fit index was 0.93, the non-normed fit index was 0.91, and the root mean residual was 0.07. The Cronbach’s α coefficients for the task-oriented, emotion-oriented, distraction, and social diversion coping subscales were 0.81, 0.74, 0.7, and 0.66, respectively. The 2-week test–retest reliability was 0.78, 0.74, 0.7, and 0.65 for the task-oriented, emotion-oriented, distraction, and social diversion coping subscales, respectively. In the Chinese version of the CISS short form, task-oriented coping was positively correlated with positive affect and extraversion and negatively correlated with neuroticism; emotion-oriented coping was negatively correlated with extraversion and positively correlated with negative affect, anxiety, and neuroticism; distraction coping was positively correlated with neuroticism, extroversion, anxiety, positive affect, and negative affect and negatively correlated with psychoticism; and social diversion coping was positively correlated with extroversion and positive affect and negatively correlated with psychoticism.ConclusionThe Chinese version of the CISS short form is satisfactorily valid and reliable among Chinese university students.

show abstract

“…Basic coping strategies were measured using the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) (17,18). The 48-item CISS has 3 scales (16 items per scale): task-oriented (T), emotion-oriented (E) and avoidance (A).…”

Section: Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How flexible is coping after acquired brain injury? A 1-year prospective study investigating coping patterns and influence of self-efficacy, executive functioning and self-awareness

Brands¹,

Köhler²,

Stapert³

et al. 2014

J Rehabil Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To investigate coping flexibility in patients with newly acquired brain injury and to investigate the influence of problem type, self-efficacy, self-awareness and self-reported executive functions on coping flexibility. Methods: Data were collected from a prospective clinical cohort study of 136 patients assessed after discharge home (mean time since injury = 15 weeks) and one year later. Situation-specific coping was measured by asking patients to complete the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) for 3 acquired brain injury (ABI)-related situations, which were then categorized into problem types (physical, cognitive, emotional, behavioural, communication, other). Coping consistency (number of strategies used throughout every situation) and variability (range in frequency of use of strategies over situations) were measured. Random effects regression analyses were used. Results: Patients used more task-oriented coping for cognitive compared with physical problems. Coping variability was limited. Reliance on emotion-oriented coping decreased over time. Higher self-efficacy correlated with increased task-oriented and avoidance coping and decreased emotionoriented coping. Greater self-reported problems in executive function correlated with greater consistency in task-oriented and emotion-oriented strategies. Conclusion: Patients with acquired brain injury rely on a defined set of coping options across situations and time. High self-efficacy increases active coping. Subjective executive dysfunction might hamper effective strategy selection.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) in patients with acquired brain injury.

Cited by 31 publications

References 45 publications

Influence of Self-Efficacy and Coping on Quality of Life and Social Participation After Acquired Brain Injury: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study

Influence of Self-Efficacy and Coping on Quality of Life and Social Participation After Acquired Brain Injury: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study

Adapting the short form of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations into Chinese

How flexible is coping after acquired brain injury? A 1-year prospective study investigating coping patterns and influence of self-efficacy, executive functioning and self-awareness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About