2011
DOI: 10.1174/217119711794394653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Environmental Identity Scale (EID)

Abstract: The Environmental Identity (EID) Scale was proposed by Clayton to study the relationship between identity and nature. Although it is cited in several publications, it has rarely been subjected to psychometric analysis. The main aim of this study is to analyze the fulfilment of construct and convergent validity criteria for this scale. For this purpose, 282 university students were asked to complete a questionnaire, along with related measures: Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS), the Inclusion of Nature in Sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
39
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Research studying educational experiences in natural environments uses quantitative (Kuo et al, 2018;Largo-Wight et al, 2018) or qualitative methods (Williams and Dixon, 2013), we follow a mixed methods approach, including quantitative analyses and a phenomenographic exploration to better understand the impact of the interventions. Regarding connectedness to nature, KPST considered themselves as relatively connected to nature, and their score values placed around five, higher that those found in other studies with Spanish undergraduates (Olivos and Aragonés, 2011;Amérigo et al, 2012). After taking part in the program, scores for the four scales increased, nonetheless significant differences were only identified for the INS and the CCC scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Research studying educational experiences in natural environments uses quantitative (Kuo et al, 2018;Largo-Wight et al, 2018) or qualitative methods (Williams and Dixon, 2013), we follow a mixed methods approach, including quantitative analyses and a phenomenographic exploration to better understand the impact of the interventions. Regarding connectedness to nature, KPST considered themselves as relatively connected to nature, and their score values placed around five, higher that those found in other studies with Spanish undergraduates (Olivos and Aragonés, 2011;Amérigo et al, 2012). After taking part in the program, scores for the four scales increased, nonetheless significant differences were only identified for the INS and the CCC scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, these results should be analyzed with caution. Despite the fact that the EID has obtained higher reliability values than in this investigation (Clayton, 2003), more studies have been published on the EID that cast doubt on its psychometric properties and factorial structure (Olivos and Aragonés, 2011; Clayton, 2012). Furthermore, despite both scales referring to a type of relationship of identification with the natural environment, in the case of connectedness their authors proposed that there is an underlying idea of a biological disposition favorable to nature (biophilia), and thus of universal occurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…La importancia de consolidar positivamente los procesos de construcción de la identidad ambiental a partir de la fuerza de conexión afectiva con el entorno natural se convierten en derroteros de la psicología ambiental (Devine-Wright y Clayton, 2010;Swim et al, 2014;Kashima, Paladino y Margetts, 2014). Algunos estudios revelan la importancia de evaluar ciertos componentes de la identidad ambiental a partir de escalas actitudinales y cuestionarios (Olivos y Aragonés, 2011;Olivos et al, 2014;Navarro, Olivos y Fleury-Bahi, 2017), mientras que otros refrendan la identificación psicológica de las personas con el entorno y la predisposición para adelantar iniciativas ambientales como la exposición, la familiarización y el apego por la naturaleza, con base en la identidad ecológica y el esfuerzo individual (Morton, Van der Bles y Haslam, 2017;Rodríguez y Ortega, 2017).…”
Section: Psicología Ambientalunclassified