2003
DOI: 10.1177/1073191102250183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Hooper Visual Organization Test

Abstract: The psychometric properties of the Hooper Vsual Organization Test (VOT) have not been well investigated Here the authors present internal consistency and interrater reliability coefficients, and an item analysis, using data from a sample (N = 281) of "cognitively impaired" and "cognitively intact" patients, and patients with undetermined cognitive status. Coefficient alpha for the VOT total sample was .882. An item analysis found that 26 of the 30 items were good at discriminating among patients. Also, the int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive relationship found between memory accuracy and scores on the Hooper Visual Orientation test suggests that individuals who can create better mental visualizations are better at creating a mental image of the travelled routes, which benefits performance when retracing those routes. The Hooper Visual Orientation test measures one’s ability to mentally rotate and piece together misarranged visual information to identify the depicted object [45,46]. As such, it may be the case that individuals with higher scores on this test are better at mentally translating and combining the visual components of travelled sections of the route, to create a survey representation of the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The positive relationship found between memory accuracy and scores on the Hooper Visual Orientation test suggests that individuals who can create better mental visualizations are better at creating a mental image of the travelled routes, which benefits performance when retracing those routes. The Hooper Visual Orientation test measures one’s ability to mentally rotate and piece together misarranged visual information to identify the depicted object [45,46]. As such, it may be the case that individuals with higher scores on this test are better at mentally translating and combining the visual components of travelled sections of the route, to create a survey representation of the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuropsychological assessments. Spatial visualization ability was evaluated with the Hooper Visual Orientation test [45], which had good internal reliability, as indicated by a coefficient α of 0.88 [46]. This test is scored out of 30; it contains 30 line drawings of common objects that are portrayed as having been cut up and misaligned; participants had to mentally rotate and piece together the visual information, to identify the depicted object.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each recognised object was a hit. The coefficient alpha for the HVOT was 0·882, and the inter-rater reliabilities ranged from 0·977 to 0·992 ( 28 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the participants underwent a clinical evaluation and a neuropsychological assessment. The following neuropsychological tests were administered to each participant for the purpose of establishing a clinical diagnosis, as described previously ( Lezak et al, 2004 ; Woodward et al, 2017 ): (i) general cognitive functions were assessed using the MMSE ( Burns, 1998 ), (ii) the CDR ( Morris, 1993 ) and the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) were used as a proxy of disease severity, (iii) daily function was assessed using the Lawton–Brody Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale ( Salmon and Bondi, 2009 ), and (iv) the Hooper Visual Organization Test (Hooper) was adopted to measure the participants’ ability to organize visual stimuli ( Lopez et al, 2003 ). Testing was conducted by board-certified neuropsychologists and research staff.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%