2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale—Revised

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

50
1,552
14
20

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,654 publications
(1,636 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
50
1,552
14
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest a score of 46 on the IES-R rather than the previous recommendation of 33 (Creamer et al, 2003). A very modest increase was noted for the PCL-5 compared the majority of previously recommended cut-offs, with a cut-off score of 34 compared to previous recommended score of 33; though it should be noted that 38 has also been suggested as a cut-off for the PCL-5 (Bovin et al, 2016; Weathers et al, 2013b; Wortmann et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results suggest a score of 46 on the IES-R rather than the previous recommendation of 33 (Creamer et al, 2003). A very modest increase was noted for the PCL-5 compared the majority of previously recommended cut-offs, with a cut-off score of 34 compared to previous recommended score of 33; though it should be noted that 38 has also been suggested as a cut-off for the PCL-5 (Bovin et al, 2016; Weathers et al, 2013b; Wortmann et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…There was a general trend towards identifying higher cut-off scores to indicate probable PTSD on these measures than had previously been recommended (Creamer et al, 2003; Foa, Riggs, Dancu, & Rothbaum, 1993; Keen et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations