Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory

Javanshir, Elham; Dianat, Iman; Jafarabadi, Mohammad Asghari

doi:10.15171/hpp.2019.19

Cited by 22 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the measurement by the CBI is very useful. This is because the CBI addresses more realistically the levels of physical and mental exhaustion of health personnel, and in our case in midwives [27,63]. Moreover, this model distinguishes between occupational and personal related factors, and it is also interesting because it contemplates the relationship between healthcare professionals and patients [64].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout in Midwives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Suleiman‐Martos

Albendín‐García

Gómez‐Urquiza

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of burnout in midwives has been briefly studied. Given the negative effects of burnout syndrome in the physical and mental health, and also related to the quality of care provided, rates of absenteeism and sick leave; identifying related factors for the syndrome are needed. The aim was to determine the prevalence, levels, and factors related to the burnout syndrome, measured with the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory in midwives. A systematic review and meta-analysis were selected from CINAHL, LILACS, ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO, and Scopus databases, with the search equation “burnout AND (midwife OR midwives OR nurses midwives)”. Fourteen articles were found with a total of 8959 midwives. Most of the studies showed moderate levels of personal burnout. The prevalence obtained was 50% (95% CI = 38–63) for personal burnout; 40% (95% CI = 32–49) for work-related burnout; and 10% (95% CI = 7–13) for client-related burnout. Midwives’ age, less experience, and living alone constitute the main related factors, as well as, the scarcity of resources, work environment, and the care model used. Most midwives present personal and work-related burnout, which indicates a high risk of developing burnout. Personal factors and working conditions should be taken into account when assessing burnout risk profiles of midwives.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout in Midwives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Suleiman‐Martos

Albendín‐García

Gómez‐Urquiza

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, as it was originally developed in Danish, the overall evidence on its validity beyond the content validity is still insufficient to recommend CBI as the best OB PROM based on this review. As CBI was translated into different languages (e.g., English, German, French, Spanish, Chinese and Korean) and utilised in several countries, where it was judged as a robust PROM for OB (Milfont et al ., 2008 ; Molinero Ruiz et al ., 2013 ; Fong et al ., 2014 ; Fiorilli et al ., 2015 ; Phuekphan et al ., 2016 ; Javanshir et al ., 2019 ; Jeon et al ., 2019 ), the cross-cultural validity of the translated versions should be assessed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of burnout measures: a systematic review

Shoman

Marca

Bianchi

et al. 2021

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims Occupational Burnout (OB) is currently measured through several Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and some of them have become widely used in occupational health research and practice. We, therefore, aimed to review and grade the psychometric validity of the five OB PROMs considered as valid for OB measure in mental health professionals (the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Pines' Burnout Measure (BM), the Psychologist Burnout Inventory (PBI), the OLdenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)). Methods We conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE databases. We reviewed studies published between January 1980 and September 2018 following a methodological framework, in which each step of PROM validation, the reference method, analytical technics and result interpretation criteria were assessed. Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments we evaluated the risk of bias in studies assessing content and criterion validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypotheses testing and responsiveness of each PROM. Finally, we assessed the level of evidence for the validity of each PROM using the GRADE approach. Results We identified 6541 studies, 19 of which were included for review. Fifteen studies dealt with MBI whereas BM, PBI, OLBI and CBI were each examined in only one study. OLBI had the most complete validation, followed by CBI, MBI, BM and PBI, respectively. When examining the result interpretation correctness, the strongest disagreement was observed for MBI (27% of results), BM (25%) and CBI (17%). There was no disagreement regarding PBI and OLBI. For OLBI and CBI, the quality of evidence for sufficient content validity, the crucial psychometric property, was moderate; for MBI, BM and PBI, it was very low. Conclusion To be validly and reliably used in medical research and practice, PROM should exhibit robust psychometric properties. Among the five PROMs reviewed, CBI and, to a lesser extent, OLBI meet this prerequisite. The cross-cultural validity of these PROMs was beyond the scope of our work and should be addressed in the future. Moreover, the development of a diagnostic standard for OB would be helpful to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the PROMs and further reexamine their validity. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42019124621).

show abstract

“…In terms of validity, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted in prior research (Javanshir et al, 2019). Three factors were found using the scree plot method (Personal, Work‐related, and Client‐related Burnout).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three factors were found using the scree plot method (Personal, Work‐related, and Client‐related Burnout). Javanshir et al (2019) studied CBI properties among employees from educational centers ( n = 189), healthcare settings ( n = 187), industrial settings ( n = 184), and social services ( n = 190), but not exclusively in a nursing population.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of Copenhagen Burnout Inventory among nurses

Montgomery

Azuero

Patrician

2021

Research in Nursing & Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Worldwide, nurses have been reporting high levels of burnout. Given the high prevalence of nurse burnout, measurements of burnout need to be carefully considered for their validity and reliability. Our research team used a relatively new instrument to measure burnout among nurses: the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). This 19‐item instrument measures burnout in three dimensions: Personal, Work‐related, and Client‐related Burnout. However, the psychometric properties of the CBI have not been examined in nurses. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the CBI in a state‐wide survey of inpatient staff nurses. A total of 928 registered nurses working in Alabama‐area hospitals (N = 42 hospitals) participated in this study. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in an adequate fit to the data and supported construct validity. As evidence of convergent validity, the CBI was moderately to highly correlated with measures of the overall work environment, job satisfaction, and intent to leave, in the anticipated directions. The Cronbach's alphas for Personal Burnout, Work‐related Burnout, and Client‐related Burnout were 0.91, 0.89, and 0.92, respectively, demonstrating excellent internal consistency reliability for the subscales. Based on our data, the CBI demonstrates adequate validity and reliability for measuring burnout among frontline nurses. As nurses provide care to the most vulnerable patients in healthcare systems, their psychological well‐being is important due to the impact on quality of care on patient outcomes. The availability of the CBI on its website allows nurses, nurse managers, and researchers to evaluate burnout in a variety of nursing populations with no licensing costs.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory

Cited by 22 publications

References 21 publications

Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout in Midwives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout in Midwives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Psychometric properties of burnout measures: a systematic review

Psychometric properties of Copenhagen Burnout Inventory among nurses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About