1994
DOI: 10.1080/13854049408402043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the neurobehavioral cognitive status exam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
2
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specificity was lower than that for the MMSE. Engelhart, Eisenstein, & Meininger (1994) used the Cognistat to examine 109 geriatric subjects who were classified as neurologically impaired only, psychiatrically impaired only, neither, or both. They found that with advancing age the mean number of Cognistat scales falling into the impaired range increased regardless of clinical presence of neurological impairment.…”
Section: Mini-mental State and Cognistat Performance In An Older Afrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity was lower than that for the MMSE. Engelhart, Eisenstein, & Meininger (1994) used the Cognistat to examine 109 geriatric subjects who were classified as neurologically impaired only, psychiatrically impaired only, neither, or both. They found that with advancing age the mean number of Cognistat scales falling into the impaired range increased regardless of clinical presence of neurological impairment.…”
Section: Mini-mental State and Cognistat Performance In An Older Afrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The Cognistat has been used to identify individuals with deficits in cognitive functioning. 21 Addiction Severity Index, Fifth Edition (ASI) 22 The ASI is a semistructured interview that may be used to summarize a patient's status at admission, formulate a treatment plan, and track progress in treatment. Seven areas of functioning are measured with the ASI including physical health, employment and financial support, illegal or criminal activity, family and social relationships, psychiatric symptoms, and drug and alcohol abuse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high false-positive rate has typically been reported when studies have adopted an operational definition of impairment based on only a single NCSE scale result (Drane & Osato, 1997;Engelhart, Eisenstein, & Meininger, 1994;Fields, Fulop, Sachs, Strain, & Fillit, 1992;Osato et al, 1993). This operational definition is suboptimal when working in the area of dementia assessment since the revised NCSE manual recommends impairment on the NCSE memory scale and at least one of the other four major domains measured as described in The Manual for Cognistat (Northern California Neurobehavioral Group, Inc., 2001).…”
Section: The Ncse and Dementiamentioning
confidence: 97%