2020
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Person-Centered Version of the Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Perceptions Questionnaire (PC-AAPPQ)

Abstract: Aims Given the importance of addressing provider attitudes toward individuals with unhealthy alcohol use and the current emphasis on person-centered language to help decrease stigma and mitigate negative attitudes, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a contemporary version of the Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Perception Questionnaire (AAPPQ) that uses person-centered language and addresses the spectrum of alcohol use. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ã Role Adequacy subscale from the adapted Person-Centered Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Questionnaire (PC-AAPPQ) original six-factor structure with all 30-items was used. 13,19 A 5-level Likert scale was used ranging from 1("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). The scores were summed into a single score.…”
Section: Role Adequacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ã Role Adequacy subscale from the adapted Person-Centered Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Questionnaire (PC-AAPPQ) original six-factor structure with all 30-items was used. 13,19 A 5-level Likert scale was used ranging from 1("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). The scores were summed into a single score.…”
Section: Role Adequacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we wanted to stay consistent with the language of the original tool, the language of the administered tool could be improved upon by using person-centered language (i.e., "person living with OUD, person who has OUD" rather than "opioid user, drug user"). This shift toward using a person-first language has been supported by recent literature (Botticelli & Koh, 2016;Broyles et al, 2014;Mahmoud et al, 2020;McGinty & Barry, 2020;Saitz, 2016). Fourth, as noted by feedback in the open-ended responses, language used in the tool could have caused confusion among students, such as instructions for creating the unique identifier and wording of agree/disagree statements.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Of note, the PC-AAPPQ subscale general perceptions, which includes two items previous in the original AAPPQ work satisfaction subscale (i.e., feeling able to understand individuals who drink alcohol and liking individuals who drink alcohol; Mahmoud et al, 2020), increased significantly from baseline to follow-up. In contrast, items included in the work satisfaction subscale, which showed no increase, were having satisfaction from working with such individuals and believing it is rewarding to do so.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This version uses respectful wording that avoids perpetuating negative biases toward the population and affirms the worth and dignity of the population being treated. The PC-AAPPQ has a seven-factor structure: motivation or willingness to work with the population (three items), role adequacy (eight items), role legitimacy (three items), role support (three items), work satisfaction (two items), role-related self-esteem (nine items), and general perceptions related to alcohol use (two items; Mahmoud et al, 2020). The alpha coefficients for the five subscales ranged from α = .58 for the motivation subscale to α = .92 for the role adequacy subscale (Mahmoud et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation