2020
DOI: 10.5114/cipp.2020.98693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Polish versions of the HEXACO-60 and the HEXACO-100 personality inventories

Abstract: BackgroundThe HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R), available in 200-, 100-, and 60-item versions, has become one of the most frequently applied measurement tools for the assessment of basic personality dimensions.Participants and procedureIn this study we examined the Polish versions of the HEXACO-60 and the HEXACO-100 inventories in a community sample of 522 individuals (aged 16-75, M = 32.02, SD = 14.15, 56.3% female). We verified the factor validity of both inventories with exploratory struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 presents t-test results for mean difference between female (N = 5,673) and male (N = 5,760) on predicted trait scores. These findings of gender differences are similar to that reported by others using standard self-rated item inventories (Feingold, 1994;Ashton and Lee, 2009;Wakabayashi, 2014;Lee and Ashton, 2020;Skimina et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 5 presents t-test results for mean difference between female (N = 5,673) and male (N = 5,760) on predicted trait scores. These findings of gender differences are similar to that reported by others using standard self-rated item inventories (Feingold, 1994;Ashton and Lee, 2009;Wakabayashi, 2014;Lee and Ashton, 2020;Skimina et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Table 4 presents the inter-correlations between the personality scores inferred using the InterviewBERT-CLS model on an independent group of N = 11,433 candidates. This demonstrates that there are strong inter-correlations (|r| > 0.20) between some personality traits, and these correlations are consistent with previous findings in literature (Ashton and Lee, 2009;Lee and Ashton, 2018;Moshagen et al, 2019;Skimina et al, 2020). Figure 4 shows an example of four attention heatmaps from InterviewBERT for answers from two candidates with corresponding tokens related to Openness (O) and extraversion (X); tokens with higher attention are in darker color.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Compared to the Big Five, HEXACO is more responsive in different cultural environments ( Lee and Ashton, 2008 , 2012 , 2013 ; Saucier, 2009 ). And HEXACO struggled to respond well in all cultural contexts ( Skimina et al, 2020 ). From the available findings, only Social Self-Regulation (Conscientiousness, Honesty-Humility, and Agreeableness) and Dynamism (Openness to Experience and eXtraversion) can be free from the shackles of the cultural context in the process of application ( Saucier et al, 2014 ; Saucier and Srivastava, 2015 ; Strus and Cieciuch, 2019 ; Thalmayer et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the present study, the subscale Cronbach’s alpha values were as follows: H (0.71; 95%CI: 0.68, 0.75), E (0.70; 95%CI: 0.65, 0.75), X (0.73; 95%CI: 0.68, 0.77), A (0.80; 95%CI: 0.75, 0.85), C (0.82; 95%CI: 0.75, 0.90), and O (0.76; 95%CI: 0.70, 0.81). In the current study, the construct validity of the six-factor model of HEXACO-60 was analyzed using the same technique as in previous studies 48 50 namely principal axis factoring extraction method with varimax rotation. The results of the factorial analysis showed that the six common factors accounted for 35.2% of the item variance (similar to those reported for the original English version, i.e., 37.4% and 29.1%) 48 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%