2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Psy-flex scale: A validation study in a community sample in Korea

Duckhyun Jo,
Byeori Seong,
Eunjoo Yang
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have demonstrated similar ndings to our study, supporting the gender invariance with no signi cant differences between male and female candidates [7], [8]. On one hand, the Korean and the Turkish validation studies found that only partial scalar invariance was supported across the two genders, theorizing that the scale would not have the same meaning to men and women (focusing especially on item 5) [7], [9]. On the other hand, the Portuguese study found that men have a higher psychological exibility in comparison to women in contrary to our ndings and the ndings of Gloster's paper [8], [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have demonstrated similar ndings to our study, supporting the gender invariance with no signi cant differences between male and female candidates [7], [8]. On one hand, the Korean and the Turkish validation studies found that only partial scalar invariance was supported across the two genders, theorizing that the scale would not have the same meaning to men and women (focusing especially on item 5) [7], [9]. On the other hand, the Portuguese study found that men have a higher psychological exibility in comparison to women in contrary to our ndings and the ndings of Gloster's paper [8], [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Con gural, metric, and scalar invariance were established, indicating that the underlying structure, factor loadings and items of the scale are equivalent across sex re ecting its applicability and validity in diverse populations. Previous studies have demonstrated similar ndings to our study, supporting the gender invariance with no signi cant differences between male and female candidates [7], [8]. On one hand, the Korean and the Turkish validation studies found that only partial scalar invariance was supported across the two genders, theorizing that the scale would not have the same meaning to men and women (focusing especially on item 5) [7], [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations