2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the short form of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-S) in young people with physical disabilities

Abstract: Objective Depression is a significant issue for young people with physical disabilities. Efficient and reliable questionnaires are needed to evaluate and monitor the efficacy of depression treatments in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the 10-item version of the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI-S) in a sample of young people with physical disabilities. Methods A convenience sample of young people with physical disabilities (N = 97) was recruited and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The total scores range from 0 to 20. The instrument has high internal consistency in Spanish samples (de la Vega et al, 2016). Higher scores on the CDI-S indicate greater depressive symptomatology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total scores range from 0 to 20. The instrument has high internal consistency in Spanish samples (de la Vega et al, 2016). Higher scores on the CDI-S indicate greater depressive symptomatology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the assessment included body image of subjects using the Stunkard figure rating scale ( 102 ) in the survey. Finally, we included and assessed depression using the Children's Depression Inventory ( 103 ) at the RCT endline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores indicate more depressive symptomatology. The CDI-S has shown to provide valid and reliable scores when used with young people with a physical disability (36). In this study sample, the internal consistency of the CDI-S was found to be good (α = 0.82).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%