2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02043.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire Short-Form (CSFQ-14) in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders

Abstract: Introduction Sexual dysfunction in patients with severe mental disorders is often underestimated or overlooked by psychiatrists. A brief and valid self-report instrument for assessing sexual functioning may well contribute to changing this situation. Aims To validate the Short Form of the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) in Spanish patients with severe mental disorders. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rate of women at risk for sexual dysfunction may vary in function of used tool from 20% to 45% in the general female popu- Table 3 Rho Spearman coefficient correlations between MRS (total and subscales), CSFQ-14 (total and scales) and CESD-10 total scores (N = 117) lation [13,14,28,31,34] and 35% to 75% in menopausal samples [30,31,[34][35][36][37]. CSFQ-14 scores of our sample were similar, although not completely comparable, to those reported for Spanish women with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder [17]. In addition to the most obvious difference in mental health status, as compared to our population, they were younger, married only in 44.6%, and with no mention of menopausal status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rate of women at risk for sexual dysfunction may vary in function of used tool from 20% to 45% in the general female popu- Table 3 Rho Spearman coefficient correlations between MRS (total and subscales), CSFQ-14 (total and scales) and CESD-10 total scores (N = 117) lation [13,14,28,31,34] and 35% to 75% in menopausal samples [30,31,[34][35][36][37]. CSFQ-14 scores of our sample were similar, although not completely comparable, to those reported for Spanish women with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder [17]. In addition to the most obvious difference in mental health status, as compared to our population, they were younger, married only in 44.6%, and with no mention of menopausal status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…CSFQ‐14 scores of our sample were similar, although not completely comparable, to those reported for Spanish women with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder [17]. In addition to the most obvious difference in mental health status, as compared to our population, they were younger, married only in 44.6%, and with no mention of menopausal status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Assessments were identical at baseline and at 3-year follow-up and included: (1) demographic and clinical information obtained from the clinical records of the patients (clinical course and specific characteristics of BD, psychiatric and physical comorbidities, officially recognized disability, and psychopharmacological treatments); (2) psychometric assessment: (2a) clinician-rated outcome measures (CROMs): Spanish versions of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) 23 , Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) 24 , Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) 25 , Clinical Global Impression (CGI) 26 , Oviedo Sleep Questionnaire (OSQ) 27 , Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) 28 , Scale for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) 29 , Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) 30 , lipid profile (cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides), glucose, hepatic function (GPT, GOT, GGT, bilirubin), renal function (creatinine, BUN), hormones (PRL, TSH), and inflammatory and oxidative biomarkers (CRP, homocysteine)] were collected (for further detail, see Fuente-Tomas et al 21 ).…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the large number of instruments that have been developed for the assessment of sexual function in English-speaking contexts, only a few of them are available in Spanish and Portuguese language. Some of the existing ones are long and intrusive (Pechorro, Diniz, Almeida, & Vieira, 2009;Bobes et al, 2000); were designed to specifically assess sexual function in either men or women (IIEF; Quinta Gomes & Nobre, 2012); or have been validated or used only in clinical samples (Ávila Escribano, Pérez Madruga, Olazábal Ulacia, & López Fidalgo, 2004;García-Portilla et al, 2011;. McGahuey et al (2000) developed the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) as a valid, reliable, short, easy-to-use, nonintrusive and with clinical utility.…”
Section: Arizona Sexual Experience Scalementioning
confidence: 99%