2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-021-00572-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings also suggested that the BWAS in its Arabic version has good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.811 for the total scores, corroborating the good psychometric characteristics of the original version of the BWAS which yielded alpha values of 0.80-0.84 (Andreassen et al, 2012a, b). Similar evidence of adequate reliability was also found in the Danish (α = 0.83) (Lichtenstein et al, 2019), Italian (α = 0.82) (Molino et al, 2021), Polish (α = 0.84) , and Turkish (α = 0.76) (Denizci Nazlıgül et al, 2021) validation studies. Overall, the present findings reinforce the ability of the Arabic version of the BWAS to evaluate the seven core elements of WA throughout a unidimensional measure, practical, and easy-to-use to detect WA in Arabic-speaking workers.…”
Section: Validation Of the Arabic Version Of The Bwassupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings also suggested that the BWAS in its Arabic version has good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.811 for the total scores, corroborating the good psychometric characteristics of the original version of the BWAS which yielded alpha values of 0.80-0.84 (Andreassen et al, 2012a, b). Similar evidence of adequate reliability was also found in the Danish (α = 0.83) (Lichtenstein et al, 2019), Italian (α = 0.82) (Molino et al, 2021), Polish (α = 0.84) , and Turkish (α = 0.76) (Denizci Nazlıgül et al, 2021) validation studies. Overall, the present findings reinforce the ability of the Arabic version of the BWAS to evaluate the seven core elements of WA throughout a unidimensional measure, practical, and easy-to-use to detect WA in Arabic-speaking workers.…”
Section: Validation Of the Arabic Version Of The Bwassupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As we expected, the confirmatory factor analysis was able to replicate the 7-item one-factor structure of the BWAS found by Andreassen et al (2012a, b) in their original validation work in Western samples. Consistently, the unidimensional structure was also replicated in other validation works in Denmark (Lichtenstein et al, 2019), Turkey (Denizci Nazlıgül et al, 2021), and Italy (Molino et al, 2021), whereas a Polish study failed to support the original one-factor solution of the BWAS . Our findings also suggested that the BWAS in its Arabic version has good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.811 for the total scores, corroborating the good psychometric characteristics of the original version of the BWAS which yielded alpha values of 0.80-0.84 (Andreassen et al, 2012a, b).…”
Section: Validation Of the Arabic Version Of The Bwassupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were obtained by other authors [ 66 , 83 , 84 , 86 , 87 ]. The importance of the relationship between work addiction and depression and loneliness gains a new perspective after taking into account the socioeconomic costs of chronic stress [ 74 , 87 , 88 , 89 ]. Andreassen et al, have shown in their research that workaholism has a significant influence on the mediation between work-related stress and health-related outcomes, including emotional exhaustion, somatic symptoms, social dysfunction, and insomnia [ 90 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to earlier findings, women mention having positive working relationships with managers, the work itself, and the hours worked far more frequently than men. (Lau, 2003;Henle, 2005;O'Fallon & Butterfield, 2005;Berry et al, 2007;Cohen et al, 2013;Denizci et al, 2022) Concerning the effect of marital status, a meta-analysis done by Lau et al (2003), showed that marital status was a valid predictor of different CWBs. In a study by Sackett et al (2006), marital status tenure is significantly correlated to CWBs, and CWBs significantly differ concerning the marital status of employees (Uche et al, 2017).…”
Section: Counterproductive Work Behaviours (Cwbs) and Demographic Cha...mentioning
confidence: 99%