2016
DOI: 10.5336/nurses.2015-46763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Fertility Adjustment Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability coefficient was determined to be α.85 in the original form of the scale. Arslan and Okumuş (2016) reported that the Turkish scale had a two-factor structure, the subscale of "being stuck with having a child" had 0.80 and the "accepting a life without children" sub-dimension had 0.71 Cronbach alpha coefficient, and the total Cronbach Alpha Coefficient was 0.81. The subdimension of "being stuck with having a child" was evaluated with items 2, 3, 5, 6, and 9, and the "accepting a life without children" sub-dimension was evaluated with items 1, 4, 7, 8, and 10.…”
Section: Zimet Et Al In the Unitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability coefficient was determined to be α.85 in the original form of the scale. Arslan and Okumuş (2016) reported that the Turkish scale had a two-factor structure, the subscale of "being stuck with having a child" had 0.80 and the "accepting a life without children" sub-dimension had 0.71 Cronbach alpha coefficient, and the total Cronbach Alpha Coefficient was 0.81. The subdimension of "being stuck with having a child" was evaluated with items 2, 3, 5, 6, and 9, and the "accepting a life without children" sub-dimension was evaluated with items 1, 4, 7, 8, and 10.…”
Section: Zimet Et Al In the Unitedmentioning
confidence: 99%