2017
DOI: 10.1177/1063426617717940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of Two Short Versions of the Inventory of Callous–Unemotional Traits Among Incarcerated Youth

Abstract: Research demonstrates that psychopathy is a higher order construct comprised of several underlying facets (e.g., interpersonal, affective, behavioral). Callous-unemotional (CU) traits (e.g., lack of guilt, inability to show emotions, and affective empathy) represent a set of characteristics that are analogous to the affective features of adult psychopathy. A growing body of research indicates that CU traits delineate a subgroup of conduct problem youth having a particularly recalcitrant form of disruptive and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also reported in several previous studies, using numerous sample types. These have included samples of Chinese adults and detained adolescent populations (Wang et al, 2017; Zhang et al, 2019), two Portuguese samples—one mixed (i.e., detained female juvenile offenders and community youths; Pechorro, Hawes, Gonçalves, & Ray, 2017) and another of incarcerated male juvenile offenders (Pechorro, Gonçalves, et al, 2017), and one of detained Belgian female adolescents (Colins et al, 2016). One possible explanation is that not showing emotion to others could be due to a lack of emotion, or it could be due to simply being unwilling to show emotions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were also reported in several previous studies, using numerous sample types. These have included samples of Chinese adults and detained adolescent populations (Wang et al, 2017; Zhang et al, 2019), two Portuguese samples—one mixed (i.e., detained female juvenile offenders and community youths; Pechorro, Hawes, Gonçalves, & Ray, 2017) and another of incarcerated male juvenile offenders (Pechorro, Gonçalves, et al, 2017), and one of detained Belgian female adolescents (Colins et al, 2016). One possible explanation is that not showing emotion to others could be due to a lack of emotion, or it could be due to simply being unwilling to show emotions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICU-10 was reported to have an acceptable α coefficient (α = .78), as well as test–retest reliability over 6 months ( r = .59). The ICU-10 was further replicated using a sample of incarcerated Portuguese male juvenile offenders (incremental fit index = .90, comparative fit index [CFI] = .89, root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA] =.14; Pechorro, Gonçalves, Hawes, & Ray, 2017). However, the signal-factor model of the ICU-10 did not achieve a good model fit in Chinese adult sample (CFI = .86, Tucker–Lewis index [TLI] = .82, RMSEA = .11; Wang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Factor Structure Of Icu and Its Shortened Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICU12 constitutes two intercorrelated factors, a 7-item Callousness factor where all items are standard-scored, e.g., “Shows no remorse when he/she has done something wrong,” and a 5-item Uncaring factor, where all items are reverse-scored, e.g., “Tries not to hurt others’ feelings.” Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not at all true) to 3 (Definitely true), and factor and total scores are the sum of the item responses. The ICU12 was developed using Item Response Theory analyses and research supports its use as a valid and brief measure of CU traits in both self- and parent-report versions ( Hawes et al, 2014 ; Colins et al, 2015 ; Pechorro et al, 2017 ; Yoshida et al, 2019 ; Thøgersen et al, 2020 ). Reliability was good for the total scale (α = 0.91), and acceptable for the Callousness (α = 0.88) and Uncaring (α = 0.81) subscales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawes et al (2014) refined the ICU on the basis of item response theory and developed the SF-ICU-12 by removing most of the items from the original Unemotional factor. The SF-ICU-12 consists of two correlated factors—Callousness (7 items) and Uncaring (5 items)—with good internal consistency and external validity and has been supported in numerous studies using incarcerated (Paiva-Salisbury et al, 2017; Pechorro, Hawes, et al, 2017; Pechorro et al, 2018), community (Ueno et al, 2021), and at-risk (Thøgersen et al, 2020) samples of varying ages. Colins et al (2016) further developed the SF-ICU-11 by removing the only Unemotional item included in the SF-ICU-12 (“Does not show emotions”), which showed the lowest loading on the Callousness factor.…”
Section: Factor Structure Of the Icumentioning
confidence: 95%