1968
DOI: 10.2307/1161962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
90
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Cronbach's alpha and the corrected item-total correlation (CITC) were employed to examine the internal consistency of the questionnaire. An alpha of 0.65-0.70 is considered minimally acceptable for research, an alpha of 0.70-0.80 is considered respectable, and an alpha of 0.80-0.90 is considered good [21]. Items with a CITC value < 0.3 should be deleted from a questionnaire [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cronbach's alpha and the corrected item-total correlation (CITC) were employed to examine the internal consistency of the questionnaire. An alpha of 0.65-0.70 is considered minimally acceptable for research, an alpha of 0.70-0.80 is considered respectable, and an alpha of 0.80-0.90 is considered good [21]. Items with a CITC value < 0.3 should be deleted from a questionnaire [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bartlett's test of sphericity was used to assess the relationship among variables, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling accuracy was used to assess the factorability of the correlation matrix. Scree plots were used to corroborate decisions regarding factor extraction [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few factors with a smaller-than-0.5 load (Table 2) were deleted to enhance the validity. Due to the lack of repeated measurements, the data validity was measured by Cronbach's α, Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the final scales were calculated to ensure the reliability values exceeded the threshold of 0.7 [67]. Table 4 lists the results of reliability tests on the proposed scales.…”
Section: Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 respondents were invited to fill out the questionnaire online via social software. We initially assessed the reliability, composite reliability and discriminant validity of the measures and determined that all constructs had an acceptable level (λ ≥ 0.7, α ≥ 0.7, AVE ≥ 0.5, CR ≥ 0.6) [77,78], as shown in Tables A1 and A2. From this analysis, it was determined that no items would be eliminated or modified based on the pretest to the main study.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%